Mark
Bellcourt, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Past
Involvement in NACADA:
Years in NACADA:
9 years
National Offices
Held and Accomplishments Achieved While in Office: N/A
Regional Activities/Offices
Held, including accomplishments achieved while in office:
- Member, Region 6 steering committee, 2002-2004
- Chair, 2002 Region 6 conference — It was the first
time NACADA ever partnered with a tribal college. Of the 35
tribal colleges nationwide, Region 6 has 18 within its borders.
If NACADA is to reach out to tribal colleges, Region 6 must
take the leadership role.
Committee Activities and Accomplishments:
- Member, NACADA Diversity committee, 2004-2005
- Member, NACADA Electronic Publication Awards Committee, 2000-2001
Commission/Interest
Group Activities and Accomplishments:
- Co-Chair, Native American and Tribal College Interest Group,
2003-present
- Current member, Technology in Advising Commission and LGBTA
Concerns Commission
- Current member, Native American and Tribal College Interest
Group and Study Abroad Advising Interest Group
- Initiated the Native American and Tribal College Interest
Group following the successful regional partnership with tribal
colleges in 2002 for the Region 6 conference.
- Member, Technology in Advising Commission Steering Committee,
2000-2002
Other:
- Have attended the last 8 NACADA National Conferences and
presented since 1999.
- 2001 NACADA Outstanding Advisor Award winner
Platform
Statement:
During my seven years
with NACADA, I have been active in regional and national conferences
presenting on topics like diversity, LGBTA issues, advising Native
Americans and using technology in advising. I have supported and
initiated both national and regional attempts to increase participation
of under-represented groups in NACADA. For example, in 2002, I
co-chaired the only regional NACADA conference ever to partner
with Tribal Colleges and in 2003, I founded and co-chaired the
Native American and Tribal College Interest Group.
I think that the best
way to improve NACADA's diversity is by starting at the regional
level. We need to ask each region to identify populations currently
not being served, develop strategies for greater inclusion, and
implement initiatives for better serving uner-represented populations
in the future. We need to see more presentations regionally and
nationally to better show case 'best practices' for improving
diversity and inclusion. Also, we need to ask NACADA commissions
and special interests groups to encourage their members to think
more inclusively in planning presentations and initiatives.