Determining
the Worth of an Advising Unit
Tom Grites, Assistant to the Vice-President of Academic Affairs
In tough economic times, higher education administrators are
obliged to seek cost-saving measures and/or to conduct cost-benefit
analyses of programs. Academic advising programs have often been
the targets for such reviews. Academic advising administrators,
therefore, must be prepared to respond to these challenges before
they occur.
This article provides a framework for administrators of academic
advising programs to demonstrate the worth of the work they do.
The framework is based on an operational analysis of the advising
unit—not on mere survey data that show students are “satisfied”
with the services provided. Although the latter kinds of data
are important in supporting the overall effectiveness of an advising
unit or program, they do not demonstrate its functionality. The
framework presented here is not intended to assess effectiveness;
it is process-oriented.
Identification of Responsibilities
The first step in this analysis is to identify all of the actual
activities (functions) that are conducted by the advising unit.
This identification establishes what the advising unit actually
does—how the unit’s personnel actually spend their
time and effort. Obviously, they advise students, but do they
serve special student populations, e.g., students on academic
probation, undecided students, prospective transfer students,
readmitted students, non-degree students, etc.?
What administrative responsibilities are fulfilled by the unit?
Does the unit assign students to advisors? Does it process all
changes of major? Does the unit have responsibilities for advisor
training, to develop advising materials and resources, and/or
to maintain degree audits and other computerized tools and information
that are important for advisors—faculty and others? Does
the unit have signatory authority/ responsibility for policy exceptions,
course substitutions, graduation
clearance, etc.?
Does the unit play a role in campus College Orientation programs,
residence hall workshops, career planning efforts? Are there classroom
teaching responsibilities, e.g., Freshman Seminar, for the unit?
> The list can become exhaustive, but it is critical to identify
every single responsibility for the unit—no matter how infrequently
it occurs—because they must all be taken into consideration
in the cost analyses noted above. Those making the cost-cutting
decisions or the cost-benefit analyses are not likely to be aware
of the breadth of responsibilities and activities fulfilled by
the advising unit unless they are clearly identified.
Analyzing Alternatives
and Their Effects
The next step in the process of determining the worth of the advising
unit is to review the available alternatives for each function
identified. What will happen to this activity if the advising
unit no longer has responsibility for it, i.e., if the unit is
eliminated or suffers a significant reduction in resources—human,
fiscal, or physical (space)? Who will assume the responsibility
for it? What will be the impact of this shift? Will the activity
be eliminated?
This aspect of the framework is likely to be the most difficult
and troublesome, for two reasons. First, the advising unit is
forced to look at itself as though it didn’t exist, that
is, someone else can do the job. Second, the undesirable option
of elimination of an activity altogether must be considered. However,
this aspect should also provide the clearest demonstration of
the unit’s worth to the institution. Two examples will illustrate
the process.
Example 1: FUNCTION:
advising special populations of students
Alternative 1: transfer responsibility
to another office
Effects: new training efforts needed for different personnel;
reduction of services currently provided by that office; likely
delay in same level of service and/or effectiveness, which could
result in higher attrition of these students
Alternative 2: transfer responsibility
to faculty advisors
Effects: new training effort needed
for faculty; increased student-faculty advisor ratios; decreased
consistency of treatment likely more dissatisfaction of both
students and faculty, thus resulting in reduced effectiveness
and potentially higher attrition of these students
Alternative 3: eliminate this service
Effects: these students must assume
more responsibility for their success, which would be viewed
by some as a positive effect; likely more dissatisfaction of
students, which could result in higher attrition
Example 2: FUNCTION:
assigning students to advisors
Alternative 1: transfer responsibility
to another office, e.g., admissions, registrar, Dean, or Department
Chairs
Effects: additional time and clerical
demands on that office—potentially less effective matching
(by major, by instructor in courses, by special needs, etc.);
likely less satisfaction of students, which could result in
higher attrition
Alternative 2: computerize the assignments
Effects: program(s) must be written;
variables used in matching are fixed at the time when the program
is run, which could result in subsequent requests for changes,
for which someone must be designated to respond; likely dissatisfaction
of students, which could result in higher attrition
Alternative 3: eliminate this function
This is an activity for which elimination is not an option.
All students need to be assigned an advisor, and some process
for achieving this task in a systematic way, and the notification
to students must occur.
Once all the functions are identified by the advising unit, and
all are reviewed in the above manner, it should become obvious
to those analyzing cost measures that the advising unit is a valuable
resource that needs to be retained. In fact, the advising administrator
might even be able to provide enough evidence that would warrant
additional resources.
The important recommendation here is that advising unit administrators
prepare their cases now and not wait for a crisis, or a threat,
or an assault on the unit to occur. This functional analysis will
equip them to defend their roles and responsibilities in difficult
economic times.
The Next Step(s)
Although this article was not intended to address the effectiveness
of an advising unit, such assessment is still an important component
of demonstrating worth. Student satisfaction surveys, retention
data, numbers of student contacts, etc. are also important data
to collect and present. One extension of the exercise and framework
presented here is to quantify, in dollars, the worth of an advising
unit. This part of the process is normally presented in a workshop
format at the National Conferences.
Tom Grites
Assistant to the Vice-President of Academic Affairs
Richard Stockton College of New Jersey
609-652-4871
gritest@stockton.edu
Presidents
Column
Dear Colleagues,
It seems that everywhere I turn these days, there is news of
another state or system that is experiencing budget cuts. And
unfortunately, in many of these cases, our students are the ones
who are most adversely affected when the dollars disappear.
We are very aware that you may be on a campus that is in this
difficult situation.....so this is how we are trying to support
you so that you can continue the good work you do on behalf of
the students you serve.
The Commission on Advising Administration has compiled a list
of effective budget strategies that others have found useful on
their campus. Visit the Clearinghouse on Academic Advising to
see a list of tips compiled by the Advising Administrators Commission.
From my own perspective, I have found another approach to dealing
with a budget reduction. In the course of 28+ years in higher
education, I have heard several times “your budget has been
reduced” and more often “your budget will remain the
same” for the next year. When I get over my frustration
and all of my persuasive abilities have not resulted in any change
to the bottom line, I then move into high gear with these questions:
What does our mission mandate that we do? How can we do it differently
and perhaps more effectively? What are we doing that we do not
need to do? Why are we doing _______? What would happen if we
stopped doing this or doing this a particular way? What other
offices can we work with to share a responsibility? How can technology
assist with ________? What additional responsibilities can student
workers, interns, and graduate assistants be given to enhance
their experience in our office and to assist our full-time advisors?
What are other funding sources that support our mission? There
are many other possible questions...but you get the idea.
Taking this pro-active approach has allowed me to feel some sense
of control over the situation. If I can’t change the facts,
at least I can control how I respond to the budget reduction.
Many positive changes in our operation have occurred as a result
of asking these tough questions.
For those of you who are lucky enough not to be dealing with
budget reductions, you may find it worthwhile to begin asking
the questions listed above anyway. My guess is that you will find
something that could be done differently or not at all. As a result
you may be able to redirect those resources to a new program or
service that more effectively serves your students.
However, regardless of your current budget situation, we recognize
we need to do a better job of conducting research that demonstrates
the economic impact of quality academic advising. Issues of accountability
and limited resources are not going away. For those of you who
have developed an effective economic model, please consider sharing
your expertise. Developing a proposal for either a regional or
national conference, submitting an article to our journal, or
writing an article for the newsletter are things that would help
us all.
Thanks in advance for your willingness to share information.
As has been said before, “Information is power” and
with this type of information we have the potential to make an
even greater difference in the lives of the students we serve.
Have a great Spring....
Betsy McCalla-Wriggins
NACADA President
Rowan University
856-256-4226
wriggins@rowan.edu
Writing
and Publishing about Academic Advising: Are we Preaching to the
Choir or Spreading the Good Word?
Mary Stuart Hunter, Director
James Gahagan, Graduate Assistant
National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students
in Transition
Research and best practices in academic advising can be valuable
to new and veteran advisers looking to improve their effectiveness
in serving students. However, if academic advising as a profession
is to realize its deserved value and status on our campuses, we
must find ways to spread the good word about advising to faculty,
administrators, and decision-makers beyond the existing advising
community. As Dr. Richard Light, in his book Making the Most of
College (2001) stated, “good advising may be the single
most underestimated characteristic of a successful college experience”(p.
81). Academic advising plays an important role in student success
and retention. Therefore, we must strive to collaborate and build
partnerships to further research and assessment and spread the
good word about academic advising to the broader higher education
community.
In the academy, one of the prerequisite elements for any innovation,
process, or discipline’s establishment and acceptance is
that of a solid literature base. Therefore, we submit two strategies
for raising the status of advising on our campuses and in the
greater higher education community.
First, advisors can circulate copies of the NACADA Journal,
Academic Advising News (NACADA newsletter), and other articles
related to academic advising among colleagues and administrators.
Dialogue about academic advising issues with colleagues outside
advising circles benefit all concerned. Campus chief academic
officers receive a free paper copy of the Academic Advising News,
so NACADA members may refer to newsletter articles in communicating
with administrators.
Secondly, we encourage advisors to consider publishing advising
related research and writing in
journals and newsletters whose readership is beyond our own community
of advising professionals. Thus,
we offer the following information on submission guidelines for
publishing in nationally disseminated periodicals that reach beyond
the advising community. The information presented was gathered
from the websites listed below.
Refereed Journals
Journal of Career Planning
and Employment—Established in 1940, this journal speaks
to both sides of the college career services and HR/staffing field.
The journal, published by the National Association of Colleges
and Employers (NACE), is filled with current, in-depth information,
articles, reports, and features.
Journal
of College and University Student Housing—The journal
features articles on current research and trends in the housing
profession, book reviews, and other in-depth discussions of interest
to Association of College and University Housing Officers—International
(ACUHO-I) members.
Journal
of College Orientation and Transition—Published by the
National Orientation Directors Association (NODA), the journal
focuses on the trends, practices, research, and development of
programs, policies, and activities related to the matriculation,
orientation, transition, and retention of college students. Also
encouraged are literature reviews, “how-to” articles,
innovative initiatives, successful practices, and new ideas.
Journal of
College Student Development —Published by the American
College Personnel Association (ACPA), requests quantitative and
qualitative manuscripts on recent original research, replication
of research, reviews of research, graduate education in student
affairs, or essays on theoretical, organizational, and professional
issues.
Journal
of Higher Education—Founded in 1930, the Journal of
Higher Education is a leading scholarly journal on the institution
of higher education. Articles combine disciplinary methods with
critical insight to investigate issues important to faculty, administrators,
and program managers.
Journal
of The First-Year Experience—Designed to disseminate
research findings on retention of first-year students, publish
information on applied first-year programs, share methodology
and results of first-year program assessments, and to examine
institutional policies/programs that affect first-year students.
The NACADA
Journal—Published by the National Academic Advising
Association, this journal is dedicated to the support and professional
growth of academic advisors and the advising profession through
the publication of research, theory, practices and book reviews
regarding academic advising in higher education.
NASPA
Journal —The National Association of Student Personnel
Administrators journal, published quarterly, provides articles
written primarily for the student affairs generalist who has broad
responsibility for leadership, policy, staff development, and
management.
E-mail:office@naspa.org
Newsletters
FYE,
Newsletter of the National Resource Center for The First-Year
Experience and Students in
Transition—A quarterly newsletter offering innovative and
practical ideas for improving programs for
first-year students, transfers, and seniors. Practical, diverse,
and current examples from around the
world demonstrate how effective programming can help improve a
student’s academic career.
Magna Publications Inc.—Founded
in 1972 by William Haight, Magna produces eight subscription newsletters
in the field of higher education including, Academic Leader, Administrator,
The National On-Campus Report, Perspective, and Recruitment and
Retention in Higher Education.
NACADA
Academic Advising News—The quarterly newsletter of the
National Academic Advising Association welcomes articles and opinion
pieces directed to advisors, faculty advisors and administrators.
Other Publications
About
Campus—Sponsored by the American College Personnel Association
(ACPA), About Campus is dedicated to the idea that student learning
is the responsibility of all educators on campus. Six times a
year, About Campus offers a mix of articles and features designed
to illuminate the critical issues faced by both student affairs
and academic affairs staff working on the shared goal of helping
students learn.
Change—Change
is a magazine covering contemporary issues in higher learning.
It is intended to stimulate and inform reflective practitioners
in colleges, universities, corporations, government, and elsewhere.
Change spotlights trends, provides new insights and ideas, and
analyzes the implications of educational programs, policies, and
practices.
The journals, newsletters, and other publications we have cited
here represent a small portion of those where articles on academic
advising would be appropriate. We encourage you to pursue writing
and research on the importance of academic advising. Join us in
spreading the good word to the rest of the higher education community.
Mary Stuart Hunter
National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students
in Transition
803-777-4761
stuarth@gwm.sc.edu
Using a
Portfolio to Document Advising Effectiveness
Faye Vowell, Western New Mexico University
Janet Wallet-Ortiz, Western New Mexico University
Why use an advising portfolio?
An advising portfolio provides a rich and diverse way to document
advising expertise. Portfolio use is increasingly prevalent in
higher education. Student portfolios are used to demonstrate that
students have met the desired outcomes of a given major or program.
Faculty use teaching portfolios to illustrate their mastery when
they apply for promotion or tenure. Universities create portfolios
for a number of purposes and audiences—such as accreditation
or student recruitment. Portfolios provide flexibility; advisors
can use both quantitative and qualitative measures and can customize
their portfolio to fit their particular advising situation. So
using a portfolio to document advising performance puts advisors
in the mainstream of assessment activities which are becoming
more demanding as well as more sophisticated in their call for
accountability.
Portfolios can respond to a variety of needs both formative
and summative. A formative portfolio documents growth; it is most
often used for personal development. A summative portfolio illustrates
mastery in a specified area and might be used for an annual performance
review or to apply for promotion or tenure. When assembling a
portfolio, it is important to know exactly who the audience is
in order to assemble the most convincing evidence and to know
the purpose of the portfolio.
Assembling the Portfolio
Consider including the following artifacts: an advising philosophy
statement, advising goal/objective(s) to be addressed in this
portfolio, advisee demographics, your specific advising responsibilities,
evidence of mastery or growth in addressing these responsibilities,
and a reflective essay which provides the context for the artifacts
or items included.
Your advising philosophy is a personal statement growing out
of your own beliefs and experience. It should fit within the institution’s
mission as well as the advising mission statement of your campus.
Advising goals/objectives need to be appropriate for the specific
portfolio. Student demographics would address the kinds and number
of your advisees. This information will probably be directly related
to your advising responsibilities or job description. All of these
would provide a context for the evidence of mastery or growth
in meeting job responsibilities.
For example, a summative portfolio created for an annual review
could have as a goal to demonstrate expertise in critical advising
areas deemed important on your campus. If confidentiality and
accuracy are the critical issues on your campus, you could document
training in the legal and ethical procedures regarding the release
of student information. You could include examples of current,
dated instruments that show degree plans, general education requirements,
interview questions, or special institutional forms and demonstrate
awareness of procedures for each item. You could discuss your
use of the advice of colleagues to keep abreast of any specific
changes that may not yet be in the catalog. Accessibility and
advocacy create powerful and fruitful relationships with advisees.
Crucial to this relationship is helping students feel capable
of succeeding. (Rendon, 1994). Document what you do to make students
comfortable and validated as well as help them define abilities
and match them with personal, educational, and career goals.
Evidence of Advising Outcomes:
Qualitative and Quantitative
Self-assessment tools using rubrics with specific concrete goals
and scales can identify obstacles and measure progress in overcoming
them. Timelines for projects met or deadlines delayed (and reasons
why) could be recorded and submitted. The results from advising
evaluations can be collected, analyzed, and presented.
Summaries of advising stories can be a focus, in addition to
such things as numbers of advisees, number of times an advisor
is requested, and the number of advisees retained from year to
year.
Evidence of various efforts to address student needs can demonstrate
concern for student validation inside the advising session. Letters
of support from colleagues can attest to your willingness to “go
the extra mile” to find answers for advisees. Advisors could
also include copies of any training/development certificates,
awards, honors, presentations and/or publications.
All of the above could be woven into a reflective statement
or essay that would showcase the advisor’s baseline and
subsequent growth in various specific areas used in evaluation
or to demonstrate mastery in job responsibilities.
Conclusion
In today’s climate of increased accountability and diminishing
resources, portfolios demonstrate quality advising outcomes that
are flexible and can be customized to individual situations. Two
large challenges exist in creating a portfolio: finding time and
motivation for reflection and creating a process that is not too
time consuming.
For example portfolios visit NACADA
Portfolio .
Student
Retention and Persistence
Charlie L. Nutt, NACADA Associate Director
The issue of student retention and persistence has continued
to grow in importance throughout the history of higher education
in our country. Early studies (Astin, 1977) focused on the characteristics
of those students who did not persist. Beginning in the 1970’s,
the research began to focus on the reasons students remained enrolled
and how colleges and universities could make changes or develop
programs to increase the retention of their students.
In his research, Alexander Astin (1977,1993) determined that
the persistence or retention rate of students is greatly affected
by the level and quality of their interactions with peers as well
as faculty and staff. Tinto (1987) indicates that the factors
in students dropping or “stopping” out include academic
difficulty, adjustment problems, lack of clear academic and career
goals, uncertainty, lack of commitment, poor integration with
the college community, incongruence, and isolation. Rendon (1995)
indicates in her study that two critical factors in students’
decisions to remain enrolled until the attainment of their goals
are their successfully making the transition to college aided
by initial and extended orientation and advisement programs and
making positive connections with college personnel during their
first term of enrollment. Noel (1985) stated:
It is the people who come face-to-face with students on a regular
basis who provide the positive growth experiences for students
that enable them to identify their goals and talents and learn
how to put them to use. The caring attitude of college personnel
is viewed as the most potent retention force on a campus (p.
17).
Academic advising is the only structured activity on the campus
in which all students have the opportunity for one-to-one interaction
with a concerned representative of the institution. Tinto (1987)
indicates that effective retention programs have come to understand
that academic advising is the very core of successful institutional
efforts to educate and retain students. For this reason, academic
advising, as described by Wes Habley, should be viewed as the
“hub of the wheel” and not just one of the various
isolated services provided for students. Academic advisors provide
students with the needed connection to the various campus services
and supply the essential academic connection between these services
and the students. In addition, academic advisors offer students
the personal connection to the institution that the research indicates
is vital to student retention and student success.
However, successful academic advising programs cannot be solely
responsible for retention rates on a campus. As the hub, advising
is one piece of the retention puzzle. Retention efforts must focus
on all components of the campus and building strong and effective
connections between the advising program and the various components
of campus. For example, as financial concerns often affect student
persistence, it is vital that advisors build strong collaborations
with the financial aid departments on campus. Advisors need to
be able to understand the policies and procedures that affect
students’ financial aid as well as have a clear understanding
of how to refer effectively those students in financial need.
Since student indecision as to major or career options is a
primary factor in student persistence, advising programs should
have strong links to the career services on campus as a part of
any retention plan. Several institutions, for example, Rowan University
(www.rowan.edu), have combined advising and career services into
one unit where career counselors and academic advisors are cross
trained to work with students in both areas.
Residence life is another area where essential collaborations
are needed with advising services in order to enhance student
retention and persistence. Several institutions, such as the University
of Georgia and Kansas State University,
have established advising centers in residence halls to provide
students with on-site advising and assistance. This model is extremely
valuable in establishing a sense of community where advising is
viewed as an essential part of the community.
Last, it should be clearly established that academic advising
is the direct link between the academic affairs and student affairs
components of a campus that can build a culture of student retention.
Some campuses, such as Coastal Georgia
Community College, have established committees or advisory
boards for advising which represent all constituencies of the
campus, including faculty, students, student affairs personnel,
and staff. Often these committees report to both the Vice Presidents
for Academic Affairs and Student Affairs establishing that campus-wide
collaborations, with advising as the central focus, is necessary
for establishing effective retention efforts.
In these times of financial cut backs, student retention, persistence,
and success will continue to be a major emphasis on our college
campuses. Any retention effort must clearly recognize the value
of academic advising to the success of students and the necessity
that advising become a central part of a collaborative campus-wide
focus on the success of our students.
Charlie L. Nutt
NACADA Associate Director
785-532-5742
cnutt@ksu.edu
From
the Executive Office
It is my hope to keep you all apprised of significant projects
within NACADA that may impact your professional life at some point
in the future. These projects may simply be “exploratory”
or they may be providing the framework for a new service or understanding
within the field of advising. My point is, though, that much is
happening beyond what the members usually see, and that there
is a multitude of volunteers diligently addressing a number of
issues at any given time. Without the work of these willing volunteers,
NACADA would never be able to accomplish its goals related to
enhancing the development of students through effective academic
advising. A BIG new year THANKS to all who have contributed (and
will contribute) to NACADA’s successes!
There are several such projects underway at this time.
-
Definition of Advising Task Force—many
members have sought and asked for a comprehensive, succinct
definition of “academic advising”. Knowing that
there are many such definitions in the literature, this Task
Force has been asked to pursue the task of developing one such
definition that could be endorsed by NACADA. As you might guess,
with variety of expectations of advisors and advising coupled
with the variety of organizational and delivery models, this
will be a monumental task. Yet, volunteers have agreed to tackle
this task.
-
Advisor Certification Task Force—another
monumental task is the focus of this group. These very dedicated
members are researching, analyzing, and building a system to
recognize the competencies of advisors. Their charge includes
working with the Professional Development Committee on the identification
of “advising competencies” and the identification
of what competencies are being addressed by current NACADA or
outside professional development opportunities. Then they will
propose what and how an advisor must demonstrate to earn the
NACADA “stamp of approval” - be that a certificate,
certification, registry listing or whatever.
-
CAS/Core Values Task Force—updating
is the challenge to this Task Force. They are working to update
the NACADA Core Values and working through the Council for the
Advancement of Standards (CAS) to review and update the standards
for advising programs. These two elements are critical to the
field and such attention will assure that guidelines for the
conduct of advising programs remain current and useful to professionals
in the field.
-
Member Career Services Task Force—reviewing
and recommending! With a goal to enhance the career development
of NACADA members, this group is looking at how career services
can be enhanced - position searches, resume assistance, resource
person, career guidance, etc. Much of what we offer to students
could be offered to our members!
As you can see, a lot of folks are tackling some tough issues!
We look forward to their reports and encourage members who would
like to volunteer in such capacities to complete the volunteer
form on our web
site. If there is not space available on current committees
or task forces, we will keep you in mind for a later assignment.
NACADA’s strength is the work of its volunteer members!
And, the members benefit from discussion of the issues with colleagues
who often become a national network of friends!
Roberta “Bobbie” Flaherty
NACADA Executive Director
785-532-5717
flaherty@ksu.edu
Watch
for the Sixth National Survey of Academic Advising
In mid-to-late February, The Sixth National Survey of Academic
Advising will be arriving at two-year and four-year public and
private colleges throughout the nation. The survey, first conducted
by ACT, Inc. in 1979, has been frequently cited by members of
the advising profession, and the results have been utilized as
a catalyst to upgrade advising services on many campuses. NACADA
will, as with the fifth survey, publish the final results of this
survey in a monograph.
The sixth survey features an expanded section on technology used
to support and deliver advising. And, although previous surveys
drew stratified random samples of institutional types, the sixth
survey will be mailed to all two-year and four-year public and
private institutions.
In a pre-mailing in early February, chief academic officers will
be asked to identify the individual most knowledgeable of campus
advising. If the chief academic officer responds, on those campuses,
the survey will be mailed to the individual identified. On all
other campuses, the survey will be mailed to the chief academic
officer. The results of the survey will be published in an upcoming
NACADA monograph.
We've got to keep
meeting like this!
A simple list of conference places and dates says little to tell
you about the great things that happen both at the conferences
and on individual campuses as a result of the meetings! Registration
is proceeding for all conferences—find registration forms
at www.nacada.ksu.edu in the Events section.
An added feature at many conferences
Advising Administrator’s
Preconference Workshop
Designed for those who have responsibilities for advising programs
and services on their campuses, this 4 hour preconference workshop
will provide assistance to those
-
developing new advising programs
and altering existing programs
-
enhancing their administrative
skills
-
searching for new ideas
-
developing a network of colleagues
in the advising administration domain.
-
Advising models
-
Hiring and evaluating advisors
-
Building connections and collaborative
advising relationships across campuses
-
Designing development programs
-
Developing or enhancing faculty
advising programs
-
Other topics as indicated by participant
need.
Participants will be encouraged to share their own experiences,
success stories, and concerns. A certificate of participation
will be presented at the end of the workshop.
This 4 hour workshop will be presented at the following conferences
by Charlie Nutt, Associate Director, NACADA and regional associates:
Cost for the workshop is $50. Go to Events to register and
choose a convenient time and location.
FEBRUARY
Southwest Region 10 members and colleagues
are headed for the rocks - but that is a good thing—as they
are the Red Rocks of Sedona, AZ at the lovely Hilton Sedona Resort.
If you need a winter time lift in your spirits as well as your
professional development, this is the place to head in February!
Paula Fuhst and committee invite you to increase “The Spirit
of Academic Advising: Our Commitment to Students.” You will
leave energized, challenged and motivated towards quality advising
and student success. (February 26–28, 2003)
Mid-South Region 3 is “Making
Advising History” in Charleston, home of so many memories
of early Americana. The theme highlights how important advising
is in the history of each student. Knowing that a student’s
personal history can be determined by the effects that quality
advising programs and individuals can have, David Goss and company
are planning a program to help you be a history maker at your
own institution! (February 23–25, 2003)
MARCH
Southeast Region 4 encourages advisors
to “Catch the Wave”—what better place to do
this than on the white beaches of Pensacola—or the offices
and campuses of advisors everywhere! Put your imagination to work
and you can catch the advising wave wherever you are! Anna Shiplee
and her committee invite their region to come on down to the shore
for a quality conference! It will be worth the trip! (March 9–11,
2003) H Advising Administrator’s Preconference Workshop
offered
Northeast Region 1 is meeting in beautiful
Newport, RI—hardly what we would consider something to merely
“survive” but the committee has used a spin on the
popular show to create their own “Advisor Newport—Can
you Survive the Challenges?” This conference that should
be memorable as well as educational! Susan Campbell and her seasoned
conference committee will surely make this a meeting you do not
want to miss! (March 17–19, 2003) H Advising Administrator’s
Preconference Workshop offered
Great Lakes Region 5 and North Central Region
6 are becoming “Allies for Success” in the
great city of Madison, for truly “Mad-is-On” and everyone
hopes to have a capital time at the lakeshore Monona Terrace.
An excellent response to the call for proposals resulted in additional
sessions—thus giving participants every opportunity to explore
how explore alliances within their institutions, states and regions
to give students what they need for success. Becky Ryan, Adrienne
Thunder and a committee too large to mention without forgetting
someone are working diligently to prepare for their participants!
(March 23–25, 2003) Advising Administrator’s Preconference
Workshop offered.
APRIL
Mid-Atlantic Region 2, takes to big
city life this year in Pittsburgh, PA. Steve Pajewski and committee
are definitely making ready for you to see the “Advising-Teaching
Connection” that will be in evidence in the quality concurrent
sessions and workshops. Pittsburgh is a great place to make lots
of great connections with colleagues from Region 2 and neighboring
states! (April 2–4, 2003) Several preconference sessions
are offered; including Faculty Advising in 60 Minutes. See the
web for information on all preconferences!
South Central Region 7 is heading
south to Baton Rouge, LA! Paul Ivey and his band of committee
members have been having lots of jam sessions to prepare for “Advising
and all that Jazz”, a meeting that will help you put all
the sections of your institutions on the right track to student
success. It will be worth the drive, so let’s support this
southern most state and see which Region 7 state can bring the
most complete ensemble to Baton Rouge! (April 24–26, 2003)
Advising Administrator’s Preconference Workshop offered
AND INTO MAY!
Northwest Region 8 and Pacific Region 9
are headed north, way north, to Vancouver, BC for what they predict
will be a record breaking harvest of great ideas to help advisors,
administrators and faculty. “Academic Advisors as Gardeners:
Cultivating Competence and Confidence” will provide the
framework for a wide field of sessions which deal with issues
that are important to student success. Kay Reddell and Evette
Castillo are working with their respective regions to share the
responsibilities of conference planning and implementation. Vancouver
in the spring is a fantastic place to see the fruits of good gardening
in more ways than one, so join the crowd for a great meeting!
(April 30–May 2, 2003) Advising Administrator’s
Preconference Workshop offered
-
Over 2200 individuals attended Region
Conferences last year. All states in the U.S. and the great
majority of provinces in Canada were represented!
-
Over 30% of the participants who
register for Regional Conferences became new NACADA members
last year!
-
Attendance at a Regional Conference
is one of the best ways to get acquainted with our great people
and programs offered through our association.
-
Many NACADA national and regional
leaders began their NACADA career by volunteering at a Regional
Conference. Volunteer today to climb up the leadership ladder!
Northeast Region (1)
Greetings! We are a few short weeks away from your 19th Regional
Conference in Newport, RI, March 17–19, 2003. Our colleagues
will be sharing more than 35 presentations and pre-conference
workshops and then we will enjoy the wonderful atmosphere in Newport.
Come learn, re-energize, and enjoy. Be sure to check out the region
1 website at www.nacada.ksu.edu/regions to get up to date hotel
and conference registration information. Please make your hotel
reservations before February 12 to ensure your stay.
DRIVE IN NEWS! Our area representatives are gearing up for the
spring. Look for future announcements about events in the New
York City area, Eastern and Western New York, Maine, and New Hampshire.
Susan Moyer recently organized ‘Transitions in Adulthood’,
presented at Excelsior College, Albany, NY on November 1. Fifty
advisors enjoyed lunch and a presentation by Vicki Carr (Excelsior),
followed by small group discussion.
Please feel free to email me with your questions, announcements,
and innovative ideas! We look forward to seeing you in March in
Newport!
Maura Ivanick
Region 1 Representative
Syracuse University
315-443-2207
mlivanic@syr.edu
Mid-Atlantic Region (2)
Hello Mid-Atlantic! As the new Regional Representative for Region
2, I’m honored to take over for Terry Musser, who served
our region for 4 great years! We have a lot planned for the upcoming
year, so I hope I can continue the outstanding work that she did
for the region!
I just wanted to take a minute to thank all of the people who
came out to support the region at the regional meeting at the
National Conference in Salt Lake City! I believe it was one of
the largest turnouts we’ve had at a regional meeting at
the National Conference, so I hope we can continue to support
the region in such a strong fashion. We shared a few ideas and
got a chance to network a little . . . all in all, a great time.
The plans for the 2003 Regional Conference are well under way!
The conference theme, “The Advising-Teaching Connection,”
considers the role that advisors play as educators of college
students and the affinities between academic advising and college
teaching. The conference will be held at the Sheraton Station
Square Hotel in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania from April 2-4, 2003.
We had our regional conference at the same location in 1997, so
we hope that this conference will be as much of a success as that
one! If you have any questions or would like to volunteer to help
out, please contact our conference chair—Steve Pajewski—at
sp4g@andrew.cmu.edu or
412-268-9592. Or you can visit the conference
website.
The Mid-Atlantic Region governance is composed of the regional
representative, the conference chair, and state coordinators.
The state coordinators for the Mid-Atlantic Region are:
-
Jessica DiPietro—District
of Columbia (Washington, DC)
-
Cindi Shenkle—Delaware
-
Jeff Gardner—Maryland
-
Michael Tress—New Jersey
-
Linda Lantaff—Eastern Pennsylvania
-
Harriett Gaston—Western Pennsylvania
-
Donna Dunn—Virginia
The State Coordinators assists the regional representative and
the conference chair with the planning of the regional conference
as well as coordinate state one-day conferences. For the upcoming
year, we have one-day state conferences plans at the following
locations:
-
Washington, DC—possibly at
George Washington University at end of February or beginning
of March
-
Maryland—John Hopkins University
on January 23, 2003 (conference chair—John Bader)
-
New Jersey—Burlington County
College on May 29, 2003 (conference chair—Linda Tromp)
-
Eastern Pennsylvania—possibly
Temple University sometime in the Fall Semester
If you are interested in hosting a state or regional conference,
please contact your state coordinator or the regional representative.
We are still looking for potential conference sites and/or potential
conference chairs for the 2004, 2005, and 2006 regional conferences.
You can get more information about the Region by visiting the
Mid-Atlantic
Regional web page .
The Regional Board has plans to provide more opportunities for
members to get involved at a state/regional level. If you have
an interest in increasing your involvement in NACADA at the state/regional
level, please feel free to contact me for more information; we’ll
also have updated information on the regional website.
I look forward to hearing from you and to meeting you at future
state, regional, and national conferences. If you have an interest
in becoming more involved or have general questions about the
organization in general, please feel free to contact me at:
Bill “Shoes” Johnson
Region 2 Representative
The College of New Jersey
609-771-2882
shoes@tcnj.edu
Southeast Region (4)
“Catch the Wave” to enjoy the beautiful white beaches
of Pensacola while exploring the future in advising. Our theme
is intended to make you think outside the normal realm of programs
and take a risk to develop innovative, timely, action-oriented
sessions. Conference attendees will be rejuvenated, invigorated
and empowered!
This conference is about establishing a sense of community with
fellow advisors while in the wonderful locale of Pensacola Beach.
We will have fun in the sun while refreshing our professional
outlook through a wave of invigorating programs. Be prepared to
navigate your way to the annual conference of NACADA Southeast
Region 4!
Pre-Conference Workshop (and Fees)
On Saturday, March 8, 2003, we will offer a special pre-conference
workshop for advising administrators sponsored by the National
Organization. Charlie Nutt, Associate Director of NACADA, will
be the primary facilitator of this activity. The fee for participating
in the Advising Administrator's pre-conference workshop will be
$50.00.
Where: Pensacola Beach, FL
Hotel: Beachside Resort
Dates: March 9-11, 2003
Additional information: Visit the Region
4 Conference Website
Glenn Kepic
Region 4 Representative
University of Florida
352-392-1521
gkepic@advising.ufl.edu
Great Lakes Region (5)
Region 5 members have two exceptional candidates to choose from
for regional representative in February. Beck
Ryan from the University of Wisconsin at Madison and Kay
Solomon, from Purdue University are both running. Visit
the NACADA website
to see their platform.
The 8th annual Illinois Academic Advisors’ Association
Conference was held at the Holiday Inn Select Hotel and Convention
Center in Tinley Park on November 8. The theme of this year’s
conference was “A Time of Change” and included presentations
on Technology in Advising, Working with Consumer-Oriented Students,
and The Importance of a Partnership between Academic and Career
Services. The hard work of the 2002 Conference Planning Committee
was rewarded with record attendance. This year’s conference
had 225 active participants representing 18 universities and 23
community colleges.
New officers were elected. Congratulations to: Ann
Anderson, Moraine Valley Community College,
President & State Representative, Judy
Wood, Governors State University, Vice-President, Bonnie
Jepson, Governors State University, Secretary, and Janet
Blue, Illinois State University, Treasurer. As President
of Illinois Academic Advisors’ Association Conference, Ann
Anderson will also serve on the Region 5 steering committee, as
the Illinois state liaison.
Paula Hanley has accepted a new position
at De Paul University. We are happy to see that she is staying
in our region. However, her departure from the University of Illinois
at Chicago means we have a vacant regional conference chair for
our 2004 regional conference. We are currently in consultation
with the University of Illinois at Chicago for an appointment
of a new regional conference chair.
The Region 5 steering committee met in early autumn and selected
a site for our 2005 regional conference. We are going to Toronto!
We are all looking forward to returning to Ontario after the very
enjoyable National Conference in Ottawa in 2001. We will keep
you informed of developments for Chicago in 2004 and Toronto in
2005. In the meantime, we hope to see you all in Madison Wisconsin
for our 2003 joint regional conference with Region 6, on March
23-25.
George Steele
Region 5 Representative
The Ohio Learning Network
614-995-3240
gsteele@oln.org
North Central Region (6)
Region 6 is in the process of changing its structure. Because
of the size of the region, which includes eight states and provinces,
we are forming a steering committee. This committee, which will
function as an advisory board, will be composed of seven state
or province representatives, the current and future Regional Conference
Chair, and the Regional Chair. Anyone interested in being on the
committee should contact the Region 6 chair, Kim
Roufs, kroufs@d.umn.edu
The purpose of the Steering Committee is to better connect the
states to each other and to the NACADA National Office. In addition,
it will provide leadership development opportunities for members
of Region 6 within the NACADA organizational structure.
We are, for the first time in history, having a combined Regional
Conference. Regions 5 and 6 are meeting in Madison, March 23-25th.
This should be a great conference in a great location. We will
enjoy meeting with our colleagues to the east. We are fortunate
to have Charlie Nutt, Associate Director
of NACADA, giving a pre-conference workshop for Advising Administrators.
This workshop is for those who have responsibilities for advising
programs and services on their campuses.
Also, for the first time, we are planning to have a strategically
placed drive-in conference within the next year. This day long
conference will be very budget friendly and tailored to the needs
of the area hosting. It will be through this conference that we
hope to recruit new NACADA members. Although
this is the first, we hope that there will be others to follow.
Kim Roufs
Region 6 Representative
University of Minnesota
218-726-8761
kroufs@d.umn.edu
South Central Region (7)
Region 7 was well represented at the 2002 NACADA Conference in
Salt Lake City. We had a successful regional meeting, and your
steering committee met for planning at 5:30 AM (Yes, that’s
in the morning!) on Monday. We accomplished a much needed region
business concerning the 2003 conference in Baton Rouge, the 2004
conference in Kansas, and working out future meetings of the committee.
We also worked on the budget.
As usual, Region 7 had many national award winners recognized
at the National Conference. We rock!
The Region 7 membership pins have been ordered and will be distributed
at the next conference.
The current members of the Region 7 Board/Steering Committee
are as follows:
-
Harry Cook ( hbc103t@SMSU.EDU),
Region Chair
-
Patricia Griffin ( pgriffin@FHSU.EDU)
from Kansas
-
Eileen O’Brien ( OBrienE@HSSC.EDU)
from Missouri
-
Frances Wood ( fwood@SELU.EDU)
from Louisiana
-
Rhonda Cannon ( Rhonda.Cannon@NHMCCD.EDU)
from Texas
-
Michelle Roberts ( mmcaward@OU.EDU)
from Oklahoma
-
Karen Boston ( KBoston@walton.uark.edu)
from Arkansas
-
Leslie Yard ( lyard@STLCC.EDU)
immediate past conference chair
-
Paul Ivey ( pivey1@LSU.EDU)
the chair for the 2003 conference in Baton Rouge
-
Jill Hieb ( jhieb@UKANS.EDU),
2004 conference chair
This committee does the nuts and bolts work of establishing a
leadership system for the region and establishing the manner in
which region funds are used. Please feel free to contact a steering
committee member with ideas for future activities or any questions
that you may have concerning Region 7’s goings on.
Harry Cook
Region 7 Representative
Southwest Missouri State University
417-836-5258
hbc103t@smsu.edu
Northwest Region (8)
Oregon State University hosted a Drive-In Conference on Friday,
November 1st. Nancy King from Kennesaw
State University (NACADA’s Consultant’s Bureau) was
the keynote speaker. From all reports, the conference was a HUGE
success with over 100 in attendance. Congratulations to all who
put in so many hours: Sarah Ann Hones, Kerry
Kincannon, Rachel Repp, Connie Patterson and Karen
Kvidt. And a special thanks to Dr. Robert
Burton, Assistant Provost for Academic Programs, and Dr.
Larry Roper, Vice Provost for Student Affairs. Additional
support by Kay Shaffer, Dean of the
College of Liberal Arts, and the Dean’s staff: Stephanie
Cross, Brad Dennis and Barbara Melton.
It takes a “village” to put on a conference. It is
clear by the list of “thank you’s,” that NACADA
has great support at Oregon State University. Attendees included
advisors from Washington, Oregon, California and the province
of British Columbia in Canada. Twenty-one institutions were represented
and we increased the Region 8—Oregon NACADA membership by
10%—WAY TO GO!!
Bring your rakes and hoes and participate in the Region 8/9
conference in Vancouver, Canada—“Academic Advisors
as Gardners: Cultivating Competence and Confidence.” Regional
Conference plans for our Pacific Region 9 and Northwest Region
8 Conference are rolling along. It is going to be an exciting
conference. Be sure to get on board and reserve the dates April
30 - May 2, 2003, for this super conference. We are planning a
surprise event for the opening on April 30. With participation
of two active regions, we are looking at the possibility of 6
breakouts for each session. The Ramada has been great to work
with and they have offered to extend the conference rate to families
who would like to stay over the weekend. The Vancouver area is
full of exciting things to do. There is Whistler Ski Resort (and
others), China Town, the Science Center, the Planetarium, the
Aquarium, Ford Center for the Arts, and the shopping is EXCELLENT.
The Resort is large, with an indoor pool and water slide, and
child care is provided while parents use the facilities. The restaurants
also have excellent food (we sampled them all)!
So, Region 8—let’s welcome our neighbors and show
what we have to offer!
Kay Reddell
Region 8 Representative
Western Washington University
360-650-7310
kay.reddell@wwu.edu
Advising Administrators Commission
At the commission meeting during the National Conference in Salt
Lake City, Susan Campbell (chair for
2000-2002) thanked members for their support. She presented to
Kevin McKenna the first Award for Service
to the Advising Administrators Commission. The commission members
all appreciate Kevin’s leadership and contributions to our
goals. Most of the time for the commission meeting was devoted
to discussion in small groups of goals for next year. Although
a number of different objectives were named, a focus of suggestions
was networking and exchanging best practices.
One response to the call for information exchange has been the
collection from commission members of “tips” for surviving
difficult budget times. We appreciate the good suggestions from
man
administrators that you can find summarized on the NACADA
website. Thanks to the staff at the NACADA central office
for efficiency in collecting these ideas and making them available
in a timely fashion. Additional tips are welcome and can be submitted
to the NACADA office or to Alice Reinarz.
Clearly, the use of list serves and websites has increased our
communication capabilities. While we have long appreciated the
benefits of networking, these tools are currently critical to
sharing information for mutual benefit.
Many commission members are enthusiastic about the new Advising
Administrators Institutes in San Antonio this spring. If you are
interested, you may still register for the February 15-17 program
through the NACADA website.
Individuals in the Commission who will serve as the Steering
Committee during the next year include:
-
Alice Reinarz, University of Michigan
-
Susan Campbell, University of Southern
Maine
-
Jayne Drake, Temple University
-
Cindy Iten, University of Kentucky
-
Dianne Castor, Coastal Georgia Community
College
-
Anne Kopera, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
-
Shannon Williams, University of
Texas-Arlington
Please contact any of us with your comments and concerns.
Alice Reinarz
Advising Administration Commission Chair
University of Michigan
734-647-9289
areinarz@umich.edu
Leadership
Opportunities
Those interested in a leadership opportunity in the NACADA organization
may want to start as a member of a commission steering committee
or serve on a Commission committee. The Chair provides leadership
for commission activities in support of the profession. The Chair
represents the members of the commission, their needs and concerns,
assists with the selection and evaluation of presentations for both
national and regional conferences, and communicates with the members
through the national newsletter. The Chair attends the fall Division
meeting and communicates commission needs and concerns to the Division
Representatives on the NACADA Council. To qualify for this elected
position as Chair requires at least one year of membership in the
commission and a commitment of 2 years of service.
For the June
Newsletter
Share a Great Idea!
Describe a great idea you gleaned from
your Regional Conference that you have already put into practice
or one of those “Ah-ha!” moments that hit you during
a session. E-mail Diane Matteson at
matteson@ksu.edu with 3 or 4 lines describing the idea and how
you implemented it. Include your name, institution and department
and the source of your idea! This section will be for small practical
ideas that others can start using immediately! Spread the word!
Guidelines
for Newsletter Submission
Academic Advising News is a quarterly
publication of the National Academic Advising Association. Newsletter
articles are generally quite short and informal. Original articles
and opinion pieces that are directed to practicing advisors and
advising administrators and have not been printed elsewhere are
welcome. They are printed on a space-available basis and should
not exceed 500 words. Articles may be sent to the editor, Brenda
Hart, by e-mail at bghart01@gwise.edu.
The deadlines for the newsletter are as
follows:
| Issue |
Copy Deadline |
Publication Date |
1 |
November
15 |
February
1 |
2 |
April
15 |
June
1 |
3 |
July
15 |
September
1 |
4 |
October
15 |
December
15 |
|