Article
Guidelines
The
Advising Issues & Resources section
of the Clearinghouse of Academic Advising Resource
is a juried publication that promotes the advancement of
academic advising through the greater dissemination of pertinent,
practical, and timely resources related to 'Critical Issues' within
the advising field. To meet this mission, several 'Critical
Issues' have been identified. Volunteers, with expertise in these
fields, are sought to author overviews dealing with the issues
surrounding their topic.
Overviews
are meant to inform members about the topic in an article that
can be easily read in 5 - 10 minutes i.e., the time it would take
for an advisor to eat a sandwich or drink a cup of tea.
The following guidelines should help those who volunteer to write
a 'Critical Issue' overview.
ADDRESSING
YOUR TOPIC
Article
authors should strive to represent balanced perspectives on their
assigned topic(s). The ideal submission is educational in nature,
positive in tone, and focused on particular aspects academic advising.
Case studies, best practices, real-world examples, analysis, tutorials,
perspectives and opinions are all acceptable (IT Compliance,
2007). However commercial messages and promotions are not. Submissions
must be both product- and vendor-neutral. NACADA reserves the
right to edit, modify or reject submissions that include a distinctly
favorable slant to any one vendor.
ORGANIZING
YOUR ARTICLE
In
the beginning: While
it may seem self-evident, the opening paragraph not only grabs
the reader's attention, it delineates the main theme(s) of the
article. Remember, advisors often read articles in 5-10 minute
snatches of time. Grab their attention, tell them why they should
continue reading, and let the details emerge in the body.
The
body: The majority of an article
should be devoted providing details that illustrate how this aspect
of advising is useful. What implications does your article have
for practice within the advising role?
When
possible, use references to other resources such as books/articles/web
sites that provide background. Be sure to cite these references
using the guidelines of the Publication Manual of the American
Psychological Association, 5th edition. Improperly citing, or
failing to cite, quotations and references is plagiarism and your
article cannot be published if this occurs.
Articles
are preferably written in 3rd person (advisors should.) although
1st person (we should.) is occasionally warranted. Do NOT write
in 2nd person (you should.).
In
conclusion: End the article with
a conclusion and encourage the reader to 'read more about it'
about the topic.
Annotated
Bibliography: Provide up to a dozen
resources where advisors can 'read more about' or research the
topic further. We encourage you to provide comments about each
resource to focus advisors' attention on its most applicable portions
or its use for advising. Example of an annotated
bibliography.
Discussion
questions: Provide up to 5 questions members could
use to discuss the topic presented in the article with campus
advisors.
PRODUCTION
ISSUES
Timeline:
The Clearinghouse
Director works with authors to set realistic copy deadlines.
Most deadlines are within 90 days.
Length:
The article should be between
1000 - 1650 words. Do not count the reference citations and the
annotated bibliography in this word count.
COPYRIGHT
ISSUES
Simply
stated, NACADA can not print what NACADA doesn't own. Authors
should follow the Clearinghouse's copyright
guidelines.
SUBMITTING
YOUR ARTICLE
EDITING YOUR
ARTICLE
Submission of an abstract,
synopsis or a full chapter is no guarantee of publication. NACADA
reserves the right to edit all submissions for length and suitability
to a given issue, without final and formal review of the contributor.
However, NACADA will make every effort to allow an author to preview
such alterations (IT Compliance, 2007).
Once the article is
received it will be edited at the Executive Office to fit the
Clearinghouse's format and style and submitted to the
Clearinghouse Editorial Board for comments, suggestions
and acceptance (or suggested changes). For each article, the Editorial
Board has the same goal: not just to correct grammar,
but to help you say exactly what you
want with grace and power while helping you organize the
article to best speak to our wide audience of readers (Brohaugh,
2002). Some articles require little editing, others a great deal.
Some authors fear the editing process but don't worry as the editor
makes suggestions and you have the opportunity to accept or reject
these suggestions.
Once the edit is complete
you will receive the edited article back for final approval before
final submission to the Editorial Board. At this time you will
have one last opportunity to edit for content. When agreement
is reached between the author(s) and the Editors, an edited version
of the article will be posted in the Clearinghouse.
References
Brohaugh,
William. (2002). Write Tight: How
to Keep Your Prose Sharp, Focused and Concise. Wilmington,
DE:
ISI Books.
IT Compliance. (2007).
Submission Guidelines. IT Compliance Magazine:
The Latest Insights & Perspectives From Leading IT Practitioners.
Retrieved 4-10-07 from http://www.itcompliancemagazine.com/submission-guidelines.html.
PUBLICATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Publication of Clearinghouse
articles is announced in the monthly NACADA member Highlights.
Additionally, a letter of congratulations from the Executive Office
is sent to the author(s)' administrator of choice. When the
article is accepted for publication author(s) should provide the
name and email address of the campus administrator who should
receive this e-letter.
Thanks
again for taking time to provide an article vital to advisors.
Please feel free to email miller@ksu.edu
at anytime during the writing process.
Listed
resources are member suggested; as such, listings are not
comprehensive in nature. Members are encouraged to suggest
resources they find helpful to their advising practice. Listing
of commercial sites does not imply NACADA endorsement.
COPYRIGHT
Questions?