|
Book Reviews
Issue 29(1)
Promoting
integrated and transformative assessment: A Deeper focus on student
learning
(2008). Catherine M. Wehlburg. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 224 pp.
$40.00. ISBN 978-0-470-26135-4
Review by
Leila Chavez Soliman
Glendale
Community College
The
three As—assessment, accountability, and accreditation—are intimidating
concepts and requirements in higher education. Catherine Welhburg
braves these hot topics in “ Promoting integrated and transformative
assessment: A Deeper focus on student learning .” The title
succinctly captures the essence and crux of the book: assessment
should be used first and foremost to enhance student learning. Welhburg
urges institutions to create and conduct assessment locally within
itself for its own use, not merely nor primarily for accountability
and accreditation. She echoes and quotes Angelo (1999) in his brief
but bold reminder, “Though accountability matters, learning still
matters most” (p. 25).
Welhburg’s
book is a visionary, thoroughly researched, and comprehensive resource
guide to promoting a learning-centered assessment paradigm. The
topics covered range from the history of assessment to its future
in higher education, including the role of technology. There is
something for anyone involved and has a stake in designing and implementing
transformative assessment including faculty, administrators, student
affairs, and regional accreditors.
The
author is thoughtful of the reader. She wittingly organized the
book to be read chronologically or in any order for convenience.
She includes a few diagrams that graphically illustrate such concepts
and processes as assessment feedback and institutional planning.
A few additional exhibits are also embedded within certain chapters
for quick reference. For starters, the book provides simple ways
to implement transformative assessment, such as “the ideal graduate”
exercise: thinking of what makes an ideal graduate will likely engender
learning outcomes deemed most important (p. 65).
The
book begins strongly with a clear definition of transformative assessment.
The author conscientiously describes six characteristics. First,
it must be appropriate or suitable for a person and context, as
opposed to a one-size-fits-all approach. Second, assessment must
be meaningful so that those who create assessment care about the
results. Third, it must be sustainable, that is, embedded in the
institutional cycle or culture. Fourth, it must be flexible or modifiable
for the future. Fifth, assessment must be ongoing or continuous.
Last but not least, it must be used for substantial improvement
of student learning.
Faculty
and institutional responsibility are heavily discussed to encourage
their participation. The short section on the role of accreditation
in assessment is a nice find in the penultimate chapter of the book.
Gaps or conflicts between classroom and large-scale assessments
still exist, which call for coordinated systems of multiple assessments
working together (Pellegrino, Chudowski, & Glaser, 2001). Because
accreditation drives assessment, regional accreditors should also
accredit for transformation and require institutions to create and
use assessment that can truly enrich student learning.
The
book is most useful for higher education institutions, departments,
and professionals who need to assess or reassess their assessment
policies and practices. Advisors are neither the stated nor the
intended main audience. Nonetheless, the brief discussion on collaboration
between academic and student affairs halfway through the book may
resonate most with student affairs professionals. The implication
is clear: student affairs in general must continue to gather and
share data as well as collaborate with academic affairs for transformative
assessment to happen.
Reference
Pellegrino,
J. W., Chudowski, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing
what students know: The science and design of educational assessment
. Washington , DC : National Academies Press. Retrieved January
5, 2008 , from http://www.nap.edu/books/0309072727/html/
|