Susan Campbell will be giving the
keynote address. (Bio)
Breakout
Sessions
Breakout
Sessions
Wednesday,
March 26, Session One
1.1
Playing the Mad Hatter: An Interactive Workshop on Advising
as Teaching (Longfellow A)
Shirley
Richardson, Dorothy Alexander & Vicki Nelson – Curry College
What
style is your hat? Does it change depending on the occasion?
Using hats as a metaphor, participants in this interactive workshop
will explore the potential overlap between the characteristics
of good teaching and the characteristics of good advising. Is
your advising hat different from your teaching hat? Do you sometimes
wear a firefighter’s hat to put out fires, or a chef’s hat when
seeking a recipe for success, or a health care provider’s hat
when looking for vital signs of life? According to HAT magazine,
“the golden rule is to wear a hat that you feel comfortable
and confident in, a style which suits the occasion.” What style
is your hat? Handouts will include instructions for creating
a Mad Hatter workshop at attendees’ own institutions. (TD, FA,
AA)
1.2
“Is That Road Even On The Map?” Student Transitions from Business
to Arts & Sciences (Longfellow B)
Lindy
Briggette & Peter Palumbo – Suffolk University
Have
you ever heard, “I can’t do Business – I can’t do math! My life
is over!”? Advisors in the College of Arts & Sciences at
Suffolk University are hearing statements much like this from
their students. They come to the College of Arts & Sciences
for refuge…but with MUCH trepidation.
Using
an “Advising as Teaching AND Learning” foundation, advisors
from Suffolk University will explore how a number of Business
School students have come to recognize that business may not
be the best fit. Discussion will include how students process
their “ah ha” moments and how advisors are supporting students
as they work through various fears, eventually challenging them
to explore destinations associated with other Arts & Sciences
majors. (LA, DA, UN)
1.3
Advising Special Populations: The Millennial Generation Student
(Hawthorne)
Jennifer
Varney – Southern NH University
The
Millennial Generation comes with unique characteristics and
challenges. In the increasingly competitive world of higher
education it is vital that Academic Advisors find a way to connect
with these students and serve their needs in ways that maximize
the student’s chance for academic success and satisfies the
needs of both the students and their parents. Join us for this
presentation & discussion as we think about how we can best
serve this population. (DA, 1Y, MC)
1.4
Baccalaureate Express: On Track from 2yr to 4yr (Wyeth)
Sharon
Bannon, Michael Harrison – University of Southern Maine; Margie
Fahey – Southern Maine Comm. College
The
community college system in the State of Maine is beginning
its fifth year of existence and in the first four years, enrollment
in the community colleges increased 47%. This presentation will
focus on the collaborative efforts of a wide variety of personnel
and offices at the University of Southern Maine and Maine Community
Colleges, to facilitate the transfer of students from associate
programs into baccalaureate programs. The pivotal role advising
plays in recruiting, accommodating, and retaining community
college transfer students will be examined. Presenters will
also examine the plan and process from the perspectives of the
various stakeholders: students, faculty, administrators and
professional advisors. (2Y, TS)
1.5
NACADA Region One 2007 Advising Excellence Award Winners Panel
(Marsden-Hartley)
Moderated
by Susan M. Kolls, Region One Chair
Panelists:
Jennifer Fath – University of Vermont; Ethel Hill – University
of Maine; Tanya Pitt – UNB Saint John; Jennifer Murphy – University
of Connecticut; David Dow – Bunker Hill Community College
Join
us for this session investigating what makes a NACADA Region
One Advising Excellence Award Winner tick. All panelists are
2007 recipients of the award and will share some of their insights
and experiences in an informal conversation. (TP, TD)
Wednesday,
March 26, Session Two
2.1
By Foot, Car or Online: One's School's Approach to Decentralized
Advising (Longfellow A)
Karen
James & Jennifer Owens – Southern NH University
Our
goal for this session is to engage participants in a discussion
pertaining to effective communication among advisors. The importance
of the quality advising, which occurs best when advisors are
engaged with each other, will be a main topic. We will also
provide a toolbox of skills, share our working model, and ask
for participant stories. Please join us however you can get
here-by foot, car, or plane! (DE, AA, AM)
2.2 The
Use of Adult Learning Principles in a Transfer Student Orientation
Course (Longfellow B)
Sally
Neal & Bevin Goodniss– University of Connecticut
Adult Learning Principles
(such as self-directed learning, transfer of learning, relevancy
of objectives, etc.) were used as the foundation to create a
pilot program for students transferring into the College of
Liberal Arts and Sciences. Similar to First-Year Experience
courses, this course was designated as a one-credit, semester-long
orientation course---but enrollment was limited to transfer
students who had declared a liberal arts major. NACADA participants
attending this presentation will be provided with a review of
adult learning principles, feedback from students who completed
the course, and the subsequent modifications that will be made
to the syllabus, so that the transfer experience will be enhanced
for the next group of incoming students. (TS, LA)
2.3
A Vision of Students Today (Hawthorne)
Joshua
Gaynor -- Columbia University
Michael
Wesch, an assistant professor of cultural anthropology at Kansas
State University, posted a You Tube video about how students
learn. A Vision of Students Today was produced
with 200 of his students and was uploaded to You Tube a year
ago. This moving video indicates that higher education
is failing to engage students. The four-minute video features
the results of a survey of students in Mr. Wesch’s Introduction
to Cultural Anthropology class last spring. The
students developed the survey and wrote the script. In
the video, students hold up placards showing their responses
to several questions. The students examine the relevancy
of their class assignments, class size, engagement and use of
technology, as well as many other challenges they face. Their
perceptions are stunning. After a viewing of the four-minute
video we will begin a roundtable discussion about whether higher
education is truly failing to engage our students or not and
if it is, what can we (as academic advisors) do to help. (TA,
TP)
2.4 Cancelled
Disability
Services 101 -
2.5
Peer Advising Programs – Profiles in Practice (Marsden-Hartley)
Patti
Vorfeld – Franklin Pierce University; Kevin Piskadlo – Bentley
College; Pat Halloran – Keene State College
What
are the ‘nuts & bolts’ of starting a peer advising program?
This session brings together representatives from several northeast,
four year schools to share their experience with peer advising.
Each panelist will provide a brief overview of their institution’s
program and supply relevant materials, or useful resources.
The intention of this session is to provide a variety of ideas
for participants who are interested in creating or modifying
their own peer advising programs. Following the panel presentation,
questions from the audience will be solicited and discussed.
(PA, 1Y)
2.6
Understanding the Problem of Low College Enrollment Among Minority
Men (Wyeth)
Phillip
Menzies – Fordham University at Lincoln Center
As
a Black male who overcame many obstacles in order to graduate
from college, Phillip Menzies is very concerned about low minority
male enrollment in college campuses nationwide. He first embarked
on his quest to gain clarity on this issue by making a video
of a panel discussion composed of several minority male students
at Fordham University, which he then presented at the Tri-State
Conference in Tarrytown, N.Y. last year with the intent to encourage
discussion. The enthusiastic response he received from an overflow
audience gave him the confidence to continue his investigations.
This presentation, then, will be the next step in his study.
The discussion that will follow the video presentation should
open up a much-needed dialogue among administrators who are
seeking innovative ways to increase minority male enrollment
at their institutions. (MC, HS, RS)
Thursday,
March 27, Session Three
3.1
Major Detour
Ahead! - Alternate Routes Provided (Longfellow
A)
Monica
Dimauro & Alexa Mignano – University of Massachusetts
If
you put together two or more advisors and ask them to name the
most popular majors for the millennial generation, you will
inevitably hear some version of Business (i.e. Accounting, Finance,
Management, Marketing, Hospitality and Tourism) and Communication
(i.e. Advertising, Broadcasting, Film Studies, Media Studies,
Public Relations). As a direct result, our institutions have
been forced to restrict admission to these majors and advisors
are left with the task of helping students find appropriate
“alternate routes.” Based on the advice of undergraduate program
directors, employer surveys, and current educational research,
we will present ways to enthusiastically and confidently advise
and educate students who entered the university pursuing one
of these popular areas and have been forced to choose another.
In
other words, you can get THERE from HERE! (CP, UN, TD)
3.2
Where is
"There"? Continual Institutional Change and Effective
Advising (Longfellow
B)
Carolyn
Ketchum & Jordan Swift – Northeastern University
Many
schools are experiencing large-scale changes in organization
and operations that have a trickle-down effect to advisors and
students. Major changes in policy and procedure can overwhelm
and confuse students, and working in an environment of constant
fluctuation can also significantly impact the advisor. Advisors
must have the necessary support and communication from the university
to successfully inform students of policy shifts. Our university
has evolved considerably over the last decade and can be considered
an extreme example of institutional change. Advisors at our
school have developed techniques to effectively counsel students
through continual transition while maintaining a desirable level
of job fulfillment. This presentation will examine the effects
of such transitions on both student and advisor and discuss
best practices for minimizing overall impact. (TD, AA)
3.3
Exploring the Engineering Options: We Can Get You There (Hawthorne)
Fredda
Bishop & Robyn Reafler – Rochester Institute of Technology
The
academic advisors for the Engineering Exploration program at
the Rochester Institute of Technology developed a course for
students who have not decided on a specific engineering major.
Join us as we expound on our required “Introduction to Engineering”
course, describe our unique one-on-one interviews and our many
Institute resources, all designed to help the undecided engineering
student learn about the different programs offered and feel
confident about choosing a major. Although our course is based
in the College of Engineering, it can be applied to any undeclared
or exploration program. Participants will be encouraged to share
in an exchange of ideas and best practices. (UN, 1Y, EN)
3.4
Online
Career Resources for Advisors (Wyeth)
Jim
Peacock – Kennebec Valley Community College and Kristina Ierardi
– Cape Cod Community College.
Advisors
are frequently asked questions about specific careers and occupational
trends in the process of planning a student’s academic program,
but often are not prepared to answer these questions. This workshop
will introduce attendees to at least three career information
websites that will assist you and your advisee in: answering
career-specific questions, providing occupational trends, identifying
educational requirements for specific careers, gaining knowledge
of salary ranges for occupations, and identifying transfer schools
with specific majors. Navigation through these sites will demonstrate
specific features and special characteristics. Reliability of
each site will be covered. Discussion will focus on defining
the situations and parameters that are appropriate for advisors
to provide occupational information to students and assist them
with career exploration as well as define situations that necessitate
referral to a career counselor. (CP,TA, UN)
3.5
Getting There from Here: A Primer on Assessment of Advising
(Marsden-Hartley)
Rich
Robbins – Cornell University; Susan Campbell, Beth Higgins –
University of Southern Maine, Charlie Nutt – Kansas State University/NACADA
Why
assess academic advising? What does it involve? What am I getting
myself into?
Anyone
contemplating the initiation of an assessment program for academic
advising has these and many more questions. However, in today’s
higher education climate of learning outcomes and accountability,
most of us will – sooner or later – be involved in the assessment
of academic advising. This presentation will offer reasons for
conducting assessment of academic advising, a comparison of
evaluation versus assessment, and the general terminology used
and processes involved. While time does not allow for a detailed
look at the entire assessment process, this session will serve
as a primer for the assessment of academic advising and as a
good foundation to build upon via attending other presentations
involving assessment during this conference and in the future.
(AS,RS, AA)
3.6
Building
the Advising Bridge: Minority Students & Graduate Education
(Jewett)
Cari
Moorhead, Christine Sohl, Dovev Levine – University of New Hampshire
Over
the past 20 years, total enrollments of under-represented minority
students (African Americans, Native Americans, and Latinos)
have grown more than five times faster than enrollments of White
students, and these enrollment trends are likely to continue.
(Redd, 2006) These trends, when coupled with the increasing
need for a graduate degree, demonstrate the importance of teaching
minority students the skills critical for gaining access to
graduate education. This session will give advisors important
information on the best ways to prepare minority students for
application, acceptance and funding into graduate school, as
well as a discussion of the importance of building bridges between
undergraduate advisors and their institutions' graduate program.
The presentation will discuss strategies for this bridge-building
through the collaboration experience between the UNH Honors
Program and Graduate School. (AG, MC, HA)
Thursday,
March 27, Session Four
4.1
Scenes from a Hat – Technology, Social Networking & Advising
(Longfellow A)
Susan
Kolls – Northeastern University, Mary Fraser – Central Maine
Community College, Terri Downing – Franklin Pierce University,
Joshua Gaynor – Columbia University, Jim Peacock – Kennebec
Valley Community College
Advisors
are always looking for better ways to connect with their students
- and increasingly must turn to technology to help with these
connections. Facebook, MySpace, Second Life, Friendster, Blogging,
Texting, and numerous other instant and virtual sites connect
our students to each other in real time and created time, like
never before. We need to examine our responsibilities and obligations
in helping our students understand the potential for good -
and not so good - in using these sites. While not technology
gurus, the members of this panel are interested, active and
enthusiastic about the implications and possibilities of social
networking. This panel promises to be interesting, humorous,
light-hearted, appropriately serious and informative in answering
your questions regarding technology and advising. Please feel
free to bring a question for the hat - or a question in your
head. We look forward to seeing you there. (TA, AA)
4.2
A Conversation with Keynote Speaker Susan Campbell (Longfellow
B)
4.3
Writing for NACADA: The NACADA Journal, Academic Advising Today,
and the Clearinghouse (Hawthorne)
Rich
Robbins – Cornell University
There
are many opportunities to write for NACADA. Authors from the
ranks of advising practitioners, faculty advisors, researchers,
and theorists appear in NACADA publications. While NACADA publishes
books, video-dvd-cds, and brochures, the primary focus in this
session will be to describe the purpose, content, writing guidelines,
and acceptance process for the NACADA Journal, Academic Advising
Today, and the Clearinghouse. Whatever your interests in professional
writing, this session will help you understand the various writing
opportunities within NACADA. (RS, AG)
4.4
Promoting Successful Transition through Teaching: Mandatory
Transfer Student Group Advising (Wyeth)
Steven
Viveiros, Autumn Grant & Jessica Henry – Bridgewater State
College
Can
transfer students learn all they need to know in a one-day orientation
program?
Taking
from the work being done to support the first year students,
Bridgewater State College implemented a group advising session
for first semester transfer students to ensure that all issues
of transition are settled. Students participate in group advising
at orientation to prepare them for first registration, and in
the first semester of enrollment to prepare them for fruitful
departmental advising and academic success.
Join
this session for information about the advising curriculum,
strategies for ensuring participation, initial assessment, and
feedback from students. (TS, AM)
4.5
Promoting Personal Development to Busy Students (Marsden-Hartley)
Paula
Rosenberg & Melissa Aponte – The New School
Students
pursuing degrees with intensive curriculum and students with
major external obligations (i.e. full time jobs, families, etc.)
often miss out on student life activities. For many of these
students their advisors are the only student affairs administrators
they have exposure to. This presentation will explore how advisors
can play an active role in facilitating students’ personal development.
Research and literature on this topic will be discussed and
models and ideas from a four year private liberal arts college
will also be shared. While this program will focus heavily on
fine arts students, it is the intention that the information
provided will be applicable to advisors of all majors. (DA,
FC, FS)
4.6
Supervision
is Teaching; Working is Learning (Jewett)
Stacy
Stewart, Lisa Pappajohn, Suzanne Turner – University of Southern
Maine
Do
you supervise work-study students, orientation leaders, peer
advisors or mentors? Are you looking for ways to improve your
supervision skills? This session will review how supervision
can be a learning process for both the supervisor and student
employee. Participants will discuss hiring, training, one-on-one
supervision vs. group supervision, setting boundaries, professional
development and terminating employment. Time will also be spent
discussing supervising the students of the “Digital Native”
age. (PA, TD, AM)
Thursday,
March 27, Session Five
5.1
Demystifying the College Experience for Families of First-Generation
College Students (Longfellow
A)
Alicia
D’Oyley & Peggy Cross – Regis College
First-generation
college students require unique support services to help them
persist in college. A key component, which can be overlooked,
is the role of parents and family members in supporting students.
Parents, especially those of first-generation students, need
to be educated about the college experience so that they too
can offer their own form of support within the home environment.
Institutions that partner with the parents and family members
of students send the message that they are student-centered
and committed to helping their students achieve degree completion.
Using
funds from a 5-year Title III grant, Regis College developed
a Family College Partnership program. In this session, strategies
Regis used to develop the program, as well as challenges they
faced, will be shared. (RT, FG, SC)
5.2
Universal Design - Enhancing Education for All (Longfellow
B)
Cynthia
Seltzer – Northeastern University
Universal
Design (UD) is the design of services and environments to be
usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without
the need for adaptation or specialized accommodation. UD strives
to anticipate the needs of diverse populations and create modifications
that are integrated into daily experience. This reduces the
need for students to identify themselves as “different” to meet
their educational goals, and enhances feelings of self-determination,
engagement and integration into the educational community. By
creating integrated practices, UD principles benefit not only
the “disabled,” but everyone who participates in the educational
process.
This
session will describe the theory of Universal design and discuss
simple strategies that can be incorporated into everyday practice.
(TD, SD, AM)
5.3
Understanding the Scholarship of Academic Advising: Advisors
Speak Out (Hawthorne)
Iona
Black – Yale University
Expanding
our understanding of the processes and impact of academic advising
on advisors, students and student learning is essential to the
profession and the future of NACADA. Members of the research
committee of NACADA are conducting an important study of advisor
definitions, uses and perceptions of the role of research in
advising. The study is being piloted at the 2008 Regional Conferences
as a concurrent session. Please consider lending your voice
to this important study. During the session, research committee
members will facilitate a focus group discussion, followed by
a description of the ways in which the research committee cultivates
scholarship in the field. (RS)
5.4
Creating
an Online Faculty and Professional Academic Advisor Education
Program (Wyeth)
Pam
Edwards & Beth Higgins – University of Southern Maine
Do
you have a need to create an academic advisor education program?
Are you looking for a way to improve student success by helping
faculty and professional academic advisors create a university-wide
culture that encourages informational, conceptual and relational
advising competences? Come to this session and learn how an
institution wide committee created an online academic advisor
education program. Learn about how the program was funded, the
development process, creating a realistic timeline, program
components, module design, program assessment, pitfalls to avoid,
stellar moments to celebrate, and plans for future growth. (TD,
FA, SS)
5.5
Keeping Adult Learners Connected from Orientation to Graduation
(Marsden-Hartley)
Lisa
Peck – Western Connecticut State University; Carol Gravel –
Franklin Pierce University; Patrick Holt – Fordham College of
Liberal Studies – Tarrytown; Linzi Kemp – Empire State College
– State University of New York; & Jennifer Varney – Southern
NH University
Most
of us, who work with adult learners, know that these students
juggle work, family, and other obligations along with academics.
We also know that adult learners need support and connection
with each other, as well as connection to the campus community.
But what are the best ways to make and maintain those connections?
A
panel of academic advisors and administrators from five different
colleges will discuss initiatives on their campuses that 1)
help adult learners connect with each other one-on-one, in groups
and/or online, 2) create and strengthen connections between
faculty, administrators and the adult learner. Participants
in this session will come away with ideas to take back to their
campuses for keeping adult learners connected from orientation
to graduation, including use of community spaces and their contents.
Chat rooms, interactive web pages, wikis, blogs, and virtual
meeting spaces will be discussed. (AL, TD)
5.6
Using CAPS (Career, Academic and Personal Success) as an Advising
and Retention Tool (Jewett)
Liza
Smith & Colleen Doherty – Quinsigamond Community College
Now
in its fifth year, Quinsigamond Community College’s online CAPS
plan has been redesigned to address the needs of all students
as the institution combines the advising and career planning
functions vital to student success. Originally developed as
part of a Title III grant attached to the institution’s Orientation
course, CAPS is poised to become a vital online advising and
inter-office communication tool, as well as a retention initiative
for the institution. This session will showcase, via role play,
the CAPS plan and demonstrate its use within academic advising
and career planning. Recent institutional data and Board of
Higher Education reports will be discussed. (CP, 2Y, RT)
Thursday,
March 27, Session Six
6.1
CANCELLED
BEST OF REGION ONE 2007: Success Strengthening Strategies for
Students: Spotlight on Persistence, Determination and Focus
6.2
Wait, Wait - Don't Tell Me: Delivering News Students Don't Want
to Hear (Longfellow
A)
Susan
Kolls – Northeastern University & Terri Downing – Franklin
Pierce University
Competition
for entry to popular majors is rising. Every day, a high-achieving
student is denied a transfer to a Pharmacy program. A student
at-risk is unable to hear about his limitations. An average
student falls below the requirements for the College of Business
. Are you responsible for delivering this or other potentially
distressing news? From theoretical to practical, we will examine
the role of the advisor in teaching the student to reassess,
redefine and redistribute their goals and intentions.
This will be an active, interactive session during which we will
discuss strategies for delivering bad news. Ways to package the
news in the best possible light, strategies for better student
understanding, alternative paths and follow-up strategies will
be offered.
6.3
Understanding the Scholarship of Academic Advising: Administrators
Speak Out (Hawthorne)
Iona
Black – Yale University
Expanding
our understanding of the processes and impact of academic advising
on advisors, students and student learning is essential to the
profession and the future of NACADA. Members of the research
committee of NACADA are conduction an important study of administrator
definitions, uses and perceptions of the role of research in
advising. The study is being piloted at the 2008 Regional Conferences
as a concurrent session. Please consider lending your voice
to this important study. During the session, research committee
members will facilitate a focus group discussion, followed by
a description of the ways in which the research committee cultivates
scholarship in the field. (RS)
6.4
Using Assessment
to Shape Professional Development (Wyeth)
Mark
Menezes, Elizabeth Higgins, Yvonne Souliere, Janis Albright,
Lisa Pappajohn – University of Southern Maine
The
purpose of this working session is to provide participants with
the opportunity to measure specific goals of the academic advisor
as they pertain to the specific institution. It will also help
advisors analyze their own outcomes and offer tools to help
measure these outcomes. This session is based on the evolving
work of the University of Southern Maine’s Assessment Committee.
After an initial overview of assessment principles, we will
work in small groups divided by institutional type. Within the
given parameters of our advising practices, we will work with
colleagues to identify key advisor outcomes and possible tools
used to measure these outcomes. Time will be made for sharing
our results and discussing how to initiate the development of
an advisor assessment plan on our own campus. (AS, TD)
6.5
Undecided
– Cause for Celebration (Marsden-Hartley)
Jean Kerrigan – University of Southern
Maine
“UNDECIDED
MAJOR”– Is this a contradiction in terms? Is it a cause for
concern? Is it something to avoid, or encourage? Advising students
who are at various stages of undecidedness can be an intentional,
creative, and exciting process for both advisor and student.
It can also be complex, frustrating and time consuming! Learn
more about what being undecided is (and isn’t!), and also hear
from several students in different stages of undecidedness.
If you are you looking for
ways to improve your students’ success, satisfaction, and retention
as you both navigate the waters of being undecided, attend this
session! (UN, RT, DA)
6.6
Programming—A New Direction Worth Exploring (Jewett)
Laurie
Nelson – Northeastern University
Advisors
live at the crossroads of higher education. We are in the perfect
position to point students toward resources that will enhance
their college experience. However, referring students one by
one is not always an effective use of time—even in cases where
students manage to make it from their advisors to other offices.
One
way to provide students with increased access to campus resources
is through programming. Programs create opportunities for students
to grow personally, professionally, and intellectually. They
establish connections among students and between students and
staff, and foster collaboration both within and beyond advising
offices. Come learn how one
professional advising office made programming an integral part
of our mission. Gather some ideas and take home a planning guide
to use in implementing your own programs! (SS, DA, AM)
Friday,
March 28, Session Seven
7.1
Start Here
Go Anywhere: Advising Liberal Arts Majors Through a Developmental
Model (Longfellow
A)
Nidia
Pullés-Linares, Freda McClean, Mary Quezada – Borough of Manhattan
Community College
The
presentation will showcase how Title V has supported Borough
of Manhattan Community College in the inception, development,
and implementation of a comprehensive liberal arts advising
program aimed at improving student retention for a diverse urban
population. Students´ skills are often lacking and they are
frequently wandering aimlessly through our system because they
are unsure of their ultimate educational goals. The objectives
of this presentation are to share the program’s efforts in providing
learning opportunities for faculty advisors through various
college activities in order to better equip them to deal with
common advising issues and problems. (FA, LA, DA)
7.2
Suicide Prevention: Facts & Myths (Longfellow B)
Darlene
Merrill – University of Southern Maine
7.4
“Advising
is Teaching: Mentoring is Learning” (Wyeth)
Dianne
Olsen, Robert Carroll, Alex Fraiha & Rebecca Richards –
Western Connecticut State University
Do
you have incoming freshmen or sophomores who would benefit from
a mentor? Transfer students who need guidance? Non-traditional
students, or those with disabilities, who want to feel accepted?
Or upperclassmen who want to make the most of their remaining
college years? Are you cultivating alumni?
Advising
and mentoring go hand-in-hand the same way that teaching and
learning do. Western Connecticut State University’s Peer-to-Peer
(P2P) Mentoring Program unites ALL student populations, combining
Academic Affairs with Student Life to benefit BOTH mentors and
mentees. In its third year, membership has increased over 100%.
“You CAN Get There from Here” as we show you how to create your
own voluntary, one-on-one mentoring program. WCSU’s P2P students
will share their viewpoints and experiences. (RT, SS, PA)
7.5
A Conversation with NACADA Leadership & Executive Office
Staff (Marsden-Hartley)
7.6
You Can Get There from Here: A Proactive Approach to Integrating
Teacher Certification with Undergraduate and Graduate Education
(Jewett)
Ruth
Eurenius & Cindy Glidden – University of New Hampshire
At
UNH, a graduate program in teacher education better prepares
teachers to face the increasing academic content area demands
of national standards by integrating undergraduate and graduate
education. Students have an opportunity during their undergraduate
years to acquire an expertise in an educational-relevant academic
major. Students take education core courses as electives, combining
their undergraduate education with their graduate program, leading
to teacher certification and a master's degree in a unique five-year
program. As a result a higher percentage of our students get
hired and about 90 percent remain in teaching after five years
as compared to the national average of 78 percent. (AG)
Friday,
March 28, Session Eight
8.1
What's in
a Major? Getting There from Here (Longfellow
A)
Sheryl
Mayuski & Kim Irmiter – Northeastern University
This
program will provide an update and basic review of last year's
presentation on the “What's in a Major” program at Northeastern
University, which is designed to help students choose a major.
We will discuss avenues for collaboration between various academic
departments and student affairs, including residential life
and career services. The program will transition into a discussion
of challenges associated with advising the undeclared millennial
student. Discussion will include a basis for understanding the
millennial student, their parents, and a closer examination
of the difficulties that this particular student population
faces as they try to decide on a major.
Power
point presentation and small group discussion will be employed
along with interactive activities to enhance participants' experience.
(UN, SS, 1Y)
8.2
The Road Less Traveled: Creating a Prior Learning Assessment
(PLA) Program (Longfellow
B)
Joyce
Lapping & Louise Nisbet – University of Southern Maine
Globally,
nationally, and certainly regionally, technology and the current
economy have brought great changes to our postsecondary processes.
Now we see an increasing number of adults turning to colleges
and universities not only to earn degrees but to validate the
knowledge they have acquired.
Do
you have students whose life experiences have given them college-level
knowledge? Do you wonder how you can challenge (and retain)
these students as you give them credit for what they’ve learned?
How can you create or expand a PLA Program for your institution
as you involve the expertise of advisors, faculty, and administration
in support of these students? We will walk you down this “road
less traveled.” (AL, CP)
8.3
Student Intake System (SIS) (Hawthorne)
Elaine Cataletto, Phil Hogue & Dixon Berry -- Baruch
College-City University of New York
This presentation will show how our Advisement Center went from
a cumbersome, paper-based manual system, to the 21st century.
We progressed from an old fashioned filing system to a
computer based shared network. This new computer system
keeps our contact records with students, appointment schedules
and collects data on student needs. We will explain to our fellow
advisors our experience in developing this program and how technology
transformed our academic advising roles.
The program's success depended upon the rapid and innovative
web development and an effective advising interface. The
program ensures student confidentiality by providing swipe-card
access. It saves time by allowing immediate recall of
student contact history and enables the advisors to focus on
student needs rather than file searches. By collecting
student data, SIS allows for better strategic planning to meet
Baruch students' needs.
8.4
Students
Teaching Students: A Peer Advising Path to Success (Wyeth)
Laurie
Simpson, Susan Quandt, Jessica Kaeding, Adrienne Francis &
Katye Tuttle – Westfield State College
A
two-year partnership between the Academic Advising Center and
Academic Affairs, the Peer Advising Program, represents a collaborative
initiative designed to assist students in becoming grounded
during their first year. Peer Advisors focus on academics, provide
information, and serve as an accessible resource to students.
“Pre-advising” conducted through the program offers faculty
advisors the benefit of time to focus on major-specific concerns
and opportunities. The session includes the perspectives of
professional advisors, a graduate intern, and undergraduate
peer advisors to highlight the program’s many dimensions. Framed
in the format of a syllabus, presenters will emphasize the outcomes
and assessments of teaching through advising. The presentation
will include teaching tools, assessment techniques, hiring and
supervision of peer advisors, and projected future service to
academic departments. (PA, 1Y, AM)
8.6
Advising for College Success: The Evolution and Content of a
Comprehensive First Year Advising Program
(Jewett)
Steven
Viveiros– Bridgewater State College
This
first year advising program has evolved since 1999 and now mandates
a minimum of five advising contacts for each beginning student.
The advising curriculum systematically addresses what students
need to know and be able to do to successfully manage their
academics. An overview of the process through which the
program has developed, staffing, the goals and objectives of
the program and students’ learning outcomes will be provided.
The entering class is monitored through the first college year
and beyond. Measures of particular interest are academic
standing after the first and second semesters, freshmen-sophomore
enrollment persistence, sophomore-junior persistence, persistence
among special admits and students with disabilities, as well as
graduation rates. Data will be reported in the session.
TRACKS
|
XX
|
all
tracks |
AL
|
Advising
Adult Learners |
AA
|
Advising
Administration |
AB
|
Advising
Business Majors |
SA
|
Advising
Student Athletes |
SD
|
Advising
Students with Disabilities |
TS
|
Advising
Transfer Students |
UN
|
Undecided/Exploratory
Students |
TD
|
Advisor
Training Development |
EN
|
Engineering
& Science Advising |
FA
|
Faculty
Advisors |
AG
|
Advising
Graduate and Professional Students |
LG
|
Lesbian,
Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered, Allies Concerns |
MC
|
Multicultural
Concerns |
SC
|
Small
Colleges and Universities |
TA
|
Technology
in Advising |
2Y
|
Two-Year
Colleges |
NCR
|
Non-commission
Related |
PO
|
Poster
|
PRE
|
Preconference
|
EM
|
Education
Majors |
AS
|
Assessment
of Advising |
ES
|
ESL
& International Student Advising |
NI
|
Non-Institute
Affiliated |
SS
|
Academic
Affairs/Student Services Collaboration |
CP
|
Advising
& Career Planning |
FS
|
Advising
Fine Arts Students |
HA
|
Advising
High Achieving Students |
AM
|
Advising
Models |
CA
|
Canada
|
DA
|
Developmental
Advising Developmental Advising |
DE
|
Distance
Education Advising |
EL
|
Ethical/Legal
Issues Ethical/Legal Issues |
FC
|
Facilitating
Change in Advising |
FG
|
First-generation
College Student Advising |
1Y
|
First-year
Students |
HP
|
Health
Professions Advising |
HS
|
High
School to College Advising |
LA
|
Liberal
Arts Advisors |
NA
|
Native
American and Tribal College |
PA
|
Peer
Advising & Mentoring |
PL
|
Pre-Law
Advising |
PD
|
Probation/Dismissal/Reinstatement
Issues |
RT
|
Retention
|
TP
|
Theory
& Philosophy of Advising |
CS
|
Member
Career Services |
ST
|
Study
Abroad Advising |
RS
|
Research
|