|
NACADA
Commission & Interest Group Division Meeting Minutes
Tuesday,
October 17, 2006
1:00 p.m.-6:00
p.m.
Indianapolis
, IN
I.
Introductions - Attendees
introduced themselves by giving their name, position and institution.
- Division
Representatives: Jill
Johnson, Maura Reynolds, Kathy Stockwell
- Executive
Office Liaison: Julia
Wolf
- Commission
Chairs and Incoming Chairs:
Renee Babcock, Lynne Carlson, Kathy Davis, Teri Farr, Peter Hagen,
Les Hemphill, Beth Higgins, Troy Holaday, Joyce Howland, Cindy
Iten, Bill Johnson, Peggy Jordan, Jennifer Joslin, Lee Kem, Victor
Macaruso, Kati Markowitz, Tim Moore, Jess Ray, Aura Rios Erickson,
Janice Robinson, Kris Rugsaken, Jeanette Sorensen, David Spight,
Rhonda Sprague, Peg Steele, Julie Stockenberg, Bill Van Dusen
- Interest
Group Chairs: Natasha
Buis, Mutlu Citim-Kepic, Jodi Malmgren, Chris Maroldo, Ruby Mason,
Joe Murray, Myla Rugge, Ila Schauer, Marion Schwartz, Nathan Vickers
- Division
Steering Committee:
Dianne Castor
- Absent:
Tina McNamara, Naomi Wright
II.
Minutes Approval
- The minutes for the CIG Division Meeting on October 4, 2005 in
Las Vegas , NV were approved. Chairs were e-mailed
a direct link to the minutes and asked to review them prior to the
meeting - www.nacada.ksu.edu/forleaders/CIGD/Minutes/CIGDFall05Minutes.htm.
III.
Meeting Packet Overview - Julia Wolf
briefly reviewed the contents of the packets distributed to meeting
attendees and noted when each would be discussed. She also mentioned
that their conference registration bags could be picked up at conference
registration after the Leadership dinner or on Wednesday.
1:40
p.m. Special Visit
President
Jo Anne Huber, Vice
President Jane Jacobson, Incoming President Susan
Campbell, and incoming Vice President Nancy Walburn
stopped in for a short visit to thank the leaders for
their time and efforts. Susan and Nancy explained the initiative
they will be implementing during their term - " Building Upon
Our Past, Strengthening Our Future ".
IV.
Division Overview
-
NACADA Board of Directors
and NACADA Council - Jill Johnson provided
a brief summary of the association reorganization and how the
Commission & Interest Group Division is represented on the
Council and Board of Directors. Jill referred to the organizational
chart, explaining that the focus was on advising and student development.
- Role
of your Division Representatives - Jill Johnson summarized
the role and responsibilities of the Division Reps, including
coordinating the activities of the CIG Division, communication
with Commission and Interest Group Chairs, planning meeting agendas,
and taking issues from the Division to the Council and Board.
- Role
of Executive Office and Liaison - Julia Wolf provided
an overview of her role as the Executive Office Liaison to the
CIG Division, referring to the handout in the meeting folders
that provided a detailed description of the liaison role. She
reiterated that they should contact her with any questions they
may have or when they needed assistance.
- Goals
of the CIG Division - Maura Reynolds
mentioned that a primary goal was communication and networking
with members of the commissions and interest groups. She emphasized
the importance of shared governance within the association and
that ideas were facilitated from the ground up through the Divisions.
The Chairs were encouraged to network as much as possible with
members and with other members of the leadership.
- Division
Marketing (Brochure & Steering Committee) - Julia Wolf
pointed out the revised CIG Division brochure. She also mentioned
that these brochures had been included in the registration packets
at all ten regional conferences to help inform members of the
benefits of participating in commission and interest group activities.
Lee
Kem provided an overview of a short promotional activity
that she presented during lunch at the Region 3 conference in
the spring of 2006. Lee highlighted the commissions and interest
groups during this presentation, copies of which are provided
in the division meeting packets for the chairs to review. She
encouraged the other Commission and Interest Group Chairs to contact
the Regional Conference Chair in their respective region to set
up a similar presentation for the 2007 regional conferences.
VI.
Resources for Chairs
-
NACADA Web Pages and Online
Resources - Maura Reynolds summarized
the information available on the NACADA web pages and specifically,
the CIGD web pages. She emphasized the use of the "search" function
available to find resources.
At
last year's CIG Division meeting, suggestions were made to separate
the "general user" information for members from the "leader" information,
in an effort to make the CIGD web pages more user-friendly. Julia
Wolf completed this redesign per these suggestions.
Newly
elected chairs are encouraged to review the orientation information
provided on the web soon after being elected. Besides sending
an e-mail with this orientation information to these new chairs
shortly after being elected, it was also sent again during the
summer before the annual conference, per another suggestion from
last year's division meeting.
- Chairperson
Handbooks - Jill Johnson
provided a brief overview of the online Commission Chair Handbook
and recommended to Chairs that they review it on their own time,
especially the updated "Commission Chair Expectations" section.
A similar resource is being planned for Interest Group Chairs.
-
Budget Overview and Process
- Jill Johnson explained
that funds are appropriated each fall into the overall CIGD Central
Fund account based on the total number of members for that membership
year. The Commission Chairs were encouraged to submit proposals
and budget requests. It was pointed out that, although these funds
could only be requested by the Division Reps and Commission Chairs,
Interest Group Chairs were encouraged to propose ideas that could
possibly be implemented on a Division-wide basis or collaborate
with a Commission on a joint project.
Chairs
were asked to share ideas for possible fund requests and other
suggestions for activities, which included:
- travel
grants to attend regional conferences to present on underrepresented
tracks/populations;
- travel
grants for new advising professionals and/or graduate students
to attend NACADA conferences (combine NACADA funds with institutional
funds), including the writing of support letters from NACADA
for new advising professionals to support their efforts to
get funding to attend conferences;
- offer
free 1-year memberships to graduate students to help pull
new blood into the association; and,
- assistance
in identifying topics needing more attention (i.e., special
populations).
-
Steering Committee structure
& purpose - Maura Reynolds
summarized this information and referred the chairs to the web
and to handout in the meeting folders for more detailed information.
Julia mentioned that some commissions and interest groups were
assigned to new Steering Committee members and a list of current
Steering Committee assignments is in their packets.
-
List serves and network etiquette
- Julia Wolf explained
that there are special leadership-related lists to which the leaders
were automatically added after being elected. Regarding the open
list serves managed by NACADA, Julia mentioned that the NACADA
policy is that members had to personally subscribe to these open
list serves, and NACADA could not add them automatically. Julia
also referred the chairs to the "Network Etiquette" handout in
the folder. This information was provided to help facilitate discussions
and improve the use of the list serves. Julia also suggested to
Chairs that they summarize those discussions on their respective
list serves that could be beneficial to other members, and forward
the summaries to be posted on their respective commission or interest
group "Resources" web pages.
VI.
Chair Roles and Responsibilities
- Reports
(Post-conference &
Annual), Timelines, Relation to Strategic Plan - Jill
Johnson and Kathy Stockwell gave an overview of the online
reporting system, and that the primary intent was to connect their
goals and activities to the NACADA Strategic Plan. These reports
should be completed by the continuing chairs and the incoming
chairs (in collaboration with outgoing chairs). It was suggested
to the incoming Chairs that they meet with their outgoing Chairs
sometime during the conference so they can show them how to access
the online report and demonstrate how to complete entries in the
report.
It
was mentioned by some Chairs that having all the past report entries
displayed along with more recent entries was confusing. Julia
explained that the Executive Office was planning to work on a
system for archiving the older information. This might include
displaying only those goals and activities that have not yet been
completed.
-
CIGD Fair - Jill Johnson briefly
explained the purpose of this activity. Julia Wolf
added that the Fair would be a great place for networking and
to recruit volunteers for commission and interest group activities,
such as readers for conference proposals, steering committee members,
authors for newsletter content articles, web masters, etc.
-
Commission meeting during
the conference (good
place to find your replacement) - Jill Johnson briefly
mentioned that the annual meetings were good places to find volunteers
for activities, network with colleagues, share ideas, brainstorm
hot topics and critical issues, set goals, and solicit candidates
for Chair.
-
Newsletter articles and updates
(Commission Issue
Articles and CIG Updates) - Julia Wolf explained
the difference between the topical content articles for the newsletter
written by commission and interest group chairs and the activity
updates provided by chairs for the newsletter. Volunteers were
solicited to write content articles for a few issues of the Academic
Advising Today e-publication. Chairs were encouraged to
collaborate with other units for these articles.
It
was also suggested that preparing annotated bibliographies for
their respective topical areas would be a good activity for their
units to complete.
-
Service to Commission Awards
- Julia Wolf reminded
the Commission Chairs to request $50 in funds for this award via
the online report system if they wanted to solicit nominations
and offer it in 2007.
VII.
Application for Commission Status -
Theory & Philosophy of Advising — (Vote) -
Jill Johnson reminded chairs that this proposal
was posted to the meeting information web site for review by the
chairs prior to the meeting. Peter Hagen was
available to answer questions the Chairs or Division Reps may
have concerning the proposal. Discussion followed. A comment was
made that there is a movement for the field of scholarly inquiry
in addition to theory. Some felt this would bring credibility
to developmental advising and that it was important to define
advising for the benefit of people who don't understand the rigor
of advising. It was noted that a NACADA task force was in the
process of developing a statement regarding the concept of advising.
Joyce
Howland made a motion to accept the proposal for
commission status from the Theory and Philosophy of Advising Interest
Group; seconded by Lynne Carlson.
A verbal vote was conducted. Motion
passed.
VIII.
Task Force Report: Distinctions between Commissions and Interest
Groups -
Jill
Johnson reiterated
that the purpose of this task force was to review the current
similarities and differences between these units. Jill reported
that, over the past year, the task force had communicated via
e-mail and conducted two teleconferences. The task force will
continue during the next year and she asked the Chairs to provide
more detail on the pending issues. The only issue brought forth
during the meeting was that interest groups would like a more
of a voice in reading annual conference proposals. Interest groups
do not get the opportunity to review related proposals and sponsor
up to four sessions as do the commissions so they are not guaranteed
any conference sessions related to their group's particular focus.
Chairs of the interest groups noted that they are not asking for
guaranteed spots, only an opportunity to offer feedback on the
proposals for related session tracks.
Comments
were also made that not all interest groups pine to become commissions,
and there may be some commissions that want to return to interest
group status at some point.
The
members of the task force appointed last year include Victor
Macaruso, Julie Givans,
Marion Schwartz, Adrienne
Thunder, Tina McNamara, and Jill
Johnson, Chair. Julie and Tina will no longer
be serving on the task force, and Mutlu Citim-Kepic,
Bill Johnson, and Troy Holaday
were added as new members on the task force.
IX.
New Potential Interest Groups -
Jill Johnson reminded chairs that these proposals were
posted to the meeting information web site for review by the chairs
prior to the meeting.
-
Advising Public & Urban
Affairs Majors -
Unfortunately, Adam Sikula was not able to attend
the meeting to provide additional information other than that
in the proposal.
- Appreciative
Advising - Unfortunately,
Scott Amundsen was not able to attend the meeting
to provide additional information other than that in the proposal.
- Large
Universities - Myla
Rugge was in attendance at the meeting to provide additional
information upon request. The question was asked as to the minimum
student population at an institution that might be considered
a "large university" per the interest group's focus. Myla responded
that, while the figure mentioned in the proposal was 20,000+ undergraduate
students, the members already joining the new group worked at
institutions ranging from very small colleges to universities
larger than that.
X.
Updates - Julia
Wolf provided details to the chairs for the following
items.
-
Commission and Interest Group
Fair - Chairs can
pick up display boards and push pins after the leadership dinner
or at the conference registration area tomorrow. After the Fair
was over, they could leave the display boards on the tables, but
should take any items with them that they wanted to keep.
- Annual
Meeting Head Counts/Procedures--Ideas to Get Feedback -
Each chair was given an empty packet labeled with the date, time
and location of their annual commission or interest group meeting.
Chairs were asked to take head counts at their meetings, write
the number of attendees on the packet, and return it to Julia
or another Executive Office staff member before leaving the conference.
It
had been decided via e-mail by the CIG Division prior to the conference
that the feedback forms used in the past for these annual commission
and interest group meetings would no longer be used. Each Commission
and Interest Group Chair was responsible for designing their own
form to gather feedback and other information from their members
regarding the meeting agenda, unit activities, or other issues.
Chairs
were asked to forward the templates of their meeting feedback
forms to Julia after the conference so they could be posted online
to serve as samples for future use by other chairs.
-
Certificates for Presenters
of Commission-Sponsored sessions -
Packets containing printed certificates for commission-sponsored
session presenters were distributed to Commission Chairs. Chairs
were asked to either give these certificates to the presenters
during their respective annual commission meetings or at the actual
session prior to the beginning of the presentation. If not able
to present a certificate during the conference, chairs should
return it to Julia before leaving the conference. If there was
a change in presenters, notify Julia of this as well and corrected
certificates will be sent to the presenters.
- Commission
Chair Signatures -
Julia asked the incoming Commission Chairs to sign a sheet of
blank white cover stock. Their signatures will be scanned and
saved in files to be printed on applicable commission-sponsored
session certificates next fall.
- Elections
in Spring 2007 - Julia
pointed out the leadership nomination forms in the meeting folders
and in the back of the conference program, and asked chairs to
nominate members for any of the positions being elected, and the
Commission Chair positions, in particular. Jill Johnson mentioned
that nominations were also needed for the elected CIG Division
Rep.
-
One-on-One Meetings -
Julia offered
to set up individual meetings during the conference with incoming
or continuing Chairs who might want to meet to discuss questions
they may have about their roles or division procedures, or ideas
and activities for their units. She would be available either
in the conference registration area or NACADA exhibit booth for
those who wanted to stop by and visit.
-
Additional Items - Julia
mentioned the special toll-free number available for use by NACADA
leaders when calling in to the Executive Office. She encouraged
Chairs to call or e-mail her any time throughout the year if they
had questions/ideas or needed assistance. Julia mentioned she
would be out of the office after the conference until October
31 due to her stepson's wedding in Illinois
. Chairs were reminded they
could pick up their conference registration materials and tote
bags at the conference registration desk, and asked that they
remove and turn in the extra name badge lanyard since they had
already received theirs.
XI.
Questions and Comments -
-
Bill Johnson posed
the question as to whether conference sessions were being spread
out too thin because there are too many commissions and interest
groups. He questioned whether this might be an issue of taking
presentations from other potential presenters who might not have
any other means of getting funding to attend the conference.
- Jill
Johnson mentioned
that an external review of the association was being asked to
be conducted, primarily to determine the success of the reorganization
that occurred in 2003.
XII.
Announcements
-
Annual Business Meeting
- Chairs were encouraged to attend the NACADA annual business
meeting on Friday, October 20, at 5:45pm
in the Westin Grand I Ballroom.
-
Division Meeting Feedback
Forms - Feedback forms
for the CIG Division meeting were distributed to all Chairs. Chairs
were encouraged to complete these forms and offer ideas for future
meetings and/or activities of the CIG Division.
-
New Advisors Breakfast
- Nathan Vickers invited everyone to the breakfast hosted at the
conference for new advisors.
- Leadership
dinner - Chairs were
reminded about the Leadership dinner immediately following the
Division meeting and that outgoing leaders will be recognized
at this event.
XIII.
Adjournment / Dinner
A motion was made to adjourn the meeting
by Lynne Carlson and seconded by Victor
Macaruso. The meeting was adjourned at 5:15 p.m.
|