Academic
Administrator's Guide to Budgets and Financial Management.
(2002). Margaret Barr. Jossey-Bass. 117 pp., $20.00 (paperback).
ISBN 0-7879-5957-X.
Review
by: Rania H. Sanford
School
of Education
Stanford
University
Margaret Barr demystifies budgets
in her detailed and practical book on the subject. Author, editor,
and professor of education, Barr provides an overview of the
elements that drive budgets and contribute to their structure
and development. She also delves into the rocky terrain of budget
cuts and strategies. The book is an easy read and would be particularly
useful to academic administrators for whom financial management
is a new, or perhaps secondary, responsibility.
Barr draws on vast experience in
managing many kinds of general and auxiliary budgets as she
constructs big picture concepts and scenarios. Each of the book's
five chapters is well organized into categories with headings,
sets of questions, and useful worksheets, such as Questions
to Consider Regarding the Budget Implications for Your Unit
(p. 12) and Questions Regarding the Unique Case of Capital Budgeting
(p. 73). The book is concluded with a list for further reading,
a two page glossary of terms, and a five page index, all of
which add to its reference value.
Barr exhibits a keen awareness
of her academic administrator audience, contextualizing much
of the budget discussion around issues such as enrollment, retention,
technology, and program evaluation. In her focus on budget sources,
models, and strategies, she does not lose sight of their larger
academic purpose-hence its particular relevance to advisors.
After reaching the enod of the book, readers know that a budget
is more than a "set of numbers" (p. 34) and realize that it
is a reflection of institutional priorities and needs. The budget
manager, in this context, becomes the institutional "listening
post [ who ] hears of issues and problems" (p. 2) and
aims to address them.
The chapter on pitfalls of fiscal
management is especially relevant. Barr explains how an inability
to understand unit budget history, forecast long-term consequences,
or identify hidden costs can be detrimental to unit credibility,
the securing of future funding, and as a consequence, the continuance
of programs. She ends the section with 10 pieces of advice to
new managers (p. 87) that, although grounded in common sense,
are often forgotten or ignored. In Unproductive Budget Games
(p. 91), she also warns against all-too-common practices such
as politicizing the budget process, inflating needs, or presenting
an unrealistic picture.
Barr
regards some of her book's practicality as a limitation. She
writes in the introduction that the book "will help illuminate
common problems and solutions. . . . [ but it ] does
not extend into the extremely complex and critical areas of
legal and personnel policy that are so often linked to the financial
aspects of academic management" (p. xi). Barr, therefore, does
not deal with business practices or accounting regulations central
to the daily decision making necessary for compliance and fiscal
accountability. Instead she targets advisors, chairs, or professors
who use budgets as means to an end. This focus, and "limitation,"
makes the book an invaluable resource for its audience. Offering
an understanding of the wide scope, critical aspects, and underlying
structures of budgets, the book is a great addition to advisor
libraries across higher education.