NACADA logo.gif
 

Home About NACADA Events Programs Resources Services Become a Member


 •Call for Nominations
 •Advising Awards
 •New Advisor Awards
 •Program Awards
 •Service to NACADA Award
 •Virginia N. Gordon Award
 •Pacesetter Award
 •Student Research Awards
 •NACADA Scholarships
 •Administrators' Institute Scholarships
 •Assessment Institute Scholarships
 •Graduate Student Regional Conference Scholarships
 •Summer Institute Scholarships
 •Advising Technology Innovation Awards
 •Retiree Recognition
 •Research Grants
 •Cumulative Recipient Lists
 •Campus Advising Awards
 •Awards Photos
 •Commission Awards
 •Regional Awards
Restructuring Advising

Successful Merging of Academic Advising and Career (www.prin.edu/college/academics/advising)

Principia College

Directed by: Miriam (Midge) Browning
Nominated by: James Brandt

 

In 2003, Principia College ’s Academic Advising Center (AAC) and Career Development Center (CDC) were merged into a single unit, now know as the office of Academic and Career Advising (ACA). This merger was the “brain child” of Midge Browning, who previously directed the AAC and now manages the consolidated office.

Under Midge’s leadership, the concept emerged, a strategic plan was developed, and significant challenges were identified and overcome. Various constituencies were “brought on board,” new resource requirements identified and acquired, new personnel hired, and a consolidated budget developed.

The results of the merger have been outstanding, providing tremendous benefits to the College, students, faculty, alumni and other constituencies. Significant improvements have been achieved in student contact rates, faculty engagement, new program components, and cost-efficiencies … all of which have allowed Principia to create a state-of-the-art office that helps students “into, through, and beyond” their college experiences.


Confronting the Complexities and Challenges of Change

Emmanuel College

Directed by: Carolyn Caveny

Nominated by: Nancy Northrup

In 2001, Emmanuel College experienced an 18.1% growth, followed by 21.0% in 2002, 19.4% in 2003 and 12% in 2004. The Academic Advising Program's (AAP) response to this extraordinary growth was pedagogically sound, fiscally responsible, and did not compromise the delivery of services to students.

 

NACADA's Core Values provided the framework for AAP's development. The AAP's effectiveness results from a confluence of five factors: strong leadership, a sound organization structure with theoretical underpinnings, clear goals and objectives, consistent professional development, and ongoing evaluation. The AAP functions as an integral part of the academic affairs of the College and has established strong links with offices throughout the institution.

 

The AAP reflects the blending of development, prescriptive and teaching components. Incoming students, randomly assigned to one of five academic advisors, connect with the AAP during several of Emmanuel's two-day orientations in June. During the three/four semesters that follow, advisees meet regularly with their academic advisor in group and individual meetings. This year AAP delivered services to close to 900 first-year, transfer, and undeclared sophomore students.

 

Selective initiative include: introduction of group meetings (not as a replacement of, but in addition to individual meetings), more extensive use of technology, development and implementation of an academic advising syllabus, and creative opportunities for professional staff development.

 

The AAP is evaluated yearly with national or institutional surveys. The AAP's success is evident in students' satisfaction, an increased retention rate, its recognition by faculty and administrators, and the replication of the program components by departments and other institutions.


Student Advising and Mentoring Center (www.shsu.edu/samcenter)

Sam Houston State University

Directed and nominated by: Bill Fleming / (image)

 

The SAM Center is an amalgamation of effective academic advising - accomplished by experienced, dedicated faculty and staff - and successful mentoring programs - created and implemented by a trained cadre of professionals and students. Several unique programs complement academic advising and have proven to help all students and favorably impacted retention.

 

Early in fall 2001, as the university was undergoing several changes under the leadership of a new president and with the increase of additional graduate and doctoral programs, demands on faculty to intensify scholarship became time-consuming, which caused other activities, particularly advising, to become less important. At this time advising was decentralized and borne by most of the faculty; since 1996 there had been mandatory advising for nearly 5,000 students. President Gaertner met with the Faculty Senate and proposed creating an advising center, financed by an advising fee which was consequently approved by the students.

 

Realizing that the students needed effective academic support programs to help them succeed, the merging of academic advising and support programs in one location was put into place for the fall of 2002. Data indicate that support programs have greatly benefited students. The primary reason the SAM Center works so well is because of the dedicated and talented faculty, staff, and students. However, the concept of the SAM Center is one which any university could utilize. The blending of advising and mentoring assists all students on their university journey.


Success Pure and Simple
University of Central Arkansas
Nominated by: Norma Tio

Program URL under construction.
Want more information? Contact: Norma Tio at normat@mail.uca.edu

Like many institutions, the University of Central Arkansas has wrestled with the issue of how most expediently to deliver academic advising services to students. Historically, academic advising has been done by faculty within academic departments, not surprisingly with mixed results. While some advising programs are exemplary, others are fragmented and ineffective, and this inconsistency was having a detrimental effect on the academic success and persistence of students, especially freshmen and undeclared majors. Subsequent studies by both ad hoc committees and external consultants determined that academic advising should be restructured, and in 1995 the position of Coordinator of Academic Advising was created. After a year of planning under the direction of the new coordinator, the university established the Academic Advising Center (AAC) in 1996. 

The Academic Advising Center is a collaborative effort between the six academic colleges and the Division of Undergraduate Studies, and it is unique in both model and methodology. All freshmen (regardless of major), all undeclared students (regardless of status), and all pre-education majors are advised in the AAC, an average load each semester of 2500 students. Each college assigns a faculty member to advise freshman majors in the AAC, three full-time professional advisors advise undeclared majors, and a member of Continuing Education faculty works with adult students in a program called UCA at Night. A number of innovative programs have been implemented, and, coupled with pro-active advising, these programs have already improved the success rates of the populations served by the AAC. 


Reinventing Student Intake: The START Center
Greenville Technical College
Nominated by: Shirley Hubard

Program: http://www.greenvilletech.com/Admissions/index.html#start_center  
Listing of this URL does NOT constitute permission to copy any portion of the web site.

Want more information? Contact: Carol Wilkins e-mail: wilkincaw@gvltec.edu

Greenville Technical College, through internal review, identified problem areas in the student intake process. Complex issues were addressed, and the entire admitting process was re-engineered. The study resulted in the creation of the START Center (Student Advising and Registration Team). 

With help from federal Title III Grant, an intern's hard work, and financial support from administration, the feasibility of a one-stop-shop evolved. Focus groups zeroed in on wish lists of centralized location, comfortable, inviting areas, friendly faces with can-do attitudes and a willingness to keep learning. Extensive training of the staff with expert leadership honed a top-notch group of professionals focused on new students' needs. Computerized advisor assignment processes and initiating sharing of information through advising coordinators and semester timelines, all kept the ball rolling. 

After three years, the START Center has built a solid foundation of service to its new students. Its goal of providing quality customer service in advising, registration and orientation has been met. Students start their education with confidence, guidance and direction as attested by numerous evaluation comments. With an ever-expanding base of knowledge, job duties continue to evolve, and objectives are reviewed and evaluated continuously. 

Word of the START Center program has spread rapidly. Imitation is a positive sign that our reinvention was not only necessary but that reinvention is also needed by other colleges. With supportive administrators, concrete planning, adequate resources, and people hired for their great attitudes in customer service-any college can emulate our success. 


From Prescriptive to Integrated Advising:  The Transformation of an Advising Program
Jacksonville University
Submitted by:  S. Jon Steingass

Almost one year ago, Jacksonville University initiated a new integrated advising model by centralizing services for first-year and transfer students through the establishment of an Advising Center.  The new advising delivery system resulted in a radical restructuring of the former more prescriptive advising approach.  Goals of the integrated advising model included: 1) substantially transforming and continually improving the quality, nature, and impact of academic advising; 2) impacting retention by enhancing opportunities for student success and learning potential; and 3) facilitating students' academic and personal integration to college. 

Four strategies were identified to realize these goals.  First, students were empowered through front-loading services, a structured network for frequent advisor contact and communication, and systems to facilitate educational planning.  Second, collaboration among academic and student support services was inaugurated to deliver more comprehensive programs and services.  Third, faculty and administrators were exposed to opportunities to shift their paradigms of academic advising through active participation in advisor development programs.  Fourth, interventions were designed for at-risk students through an intrusive advising program and a comprehensive early-alert system. 


Western Illinois University
University Advising and Academic Support Center
Submitted by: Burton W. Witthuhn

The University Advising and Acdemic Support Center (UAASC) is a new unit resulting from the August 1994, merger of the Office of Academic Services (designed to support at-risk students) and the University Advising Center. This merger, which occurred after two years of discussion and planning, has strengthened both units by facilitating the access to resources that enhance the developmental and intrusive advising that characterizes the new unit. 

The UAASC offers a variety of specialized programs directed to target populations. These programs include: 1) Academic Services--for academically at-risk freshmen; 2) General Orientation (GO) Program--for students without a chosen major who have completed fewer than 45 semester hours; 3) Grade Recovery in Progress (GRIP)--for regularly admitted freshmen put on probation after their first semester; 4) Transitional Advising Program (TAP)--for business students being blocked from continuing in their majors because of poor academic performance; 5) Individual Studies Program (ISP)--for students choosing to design an individualized, often interdisciplinary major; 6) Disability Support Services (DSS)--to coordinate services for students with disabilities; and 7) Special High School Program--serving students in small, local, rural high schools wanting or needing to supplement a limited high school curriculum or get a head start on their college careers. 

Each of these seven programs has been developed in response to a demonstrated student need. Each program is characterized by developmental and intrusive advising. Each program has demonstrated high levels of success reflected in student persistence and academic achievement. The institutional support is considered a profitable investment in our students. 


Jamestown Community College
ISA: An Individual Advisement Program at a Community College
Submitted by Robin Middleton

The increasing complexity of academic advisement, coupled with the college's commitment to enhance student success, were the prime motivators in considering a college-wide individual Student Advisement approach for new entering freshmen and transfer students. By providing a video-based, interactive advisement preparation session, fundamental college-wide information could be disseminated ahead of time. Students could come to their advisement sessions informed and aware, thereby maximizing use of the time with their advisor in order to create a personalized plan for academic success. 

The Individual Student Advisement Model (ISA) was developed and adapted each step of the way with input from faculty advisors, administrators, division chairs and the front line staff. This level of involvement in its development created a sense of ownership and commitment across the campus, and became evident in the feedback that was received from all members of the college community. Student surveys also reported a positive response. Compared to students who attended the group advisement session, student who went through the ISA program were more likely to report they: received helpful information from their advisors, were able to ask advisors questions regarding their program of study and career interests, and would feel comfortable going to the advisor if there were concerns about courses. Additionally, the ISA students were more likely to report that their meeting with the advisor was helpful and positive, and that they felt better prepared to begin their first semester at JCC. 


University of Utah
University College
Nominated by: John G. Francis and Herta Teitelbaum

The college will be an administrative unit for entering students, providing them with an identifiable home until they have been admitted to their academic major department. This will give new students a greater sense of belonging to a college dedicated to serving their specific needs. Academic Advising will be the primary function of the new college. The UC will be the college of record for students prior to their admission to a degree-granting program. Once the student is admitted to the major, the department will code the student into the appropriate degree college and major. 

The mission of the college will be to increase student retention and timely admission to the major, improve graduate rates, and enhance student satisfaction with their college experience; to create an environment for students that provides both academic challenge and support; to assist students in exploring fields of study, in selecting a major commensurate with their abilities and interests as well as with available educational opportunities at the University; to provide effective academic advising for lower-division students; to strengthen students' involvement in learning and foster relationships with faculty; to increase new students' participation in academic programs designed to promote academic integration and to provide a rigorous academic experience; and to introduce students as needed to the many academic support programs available on campus. 


Temple University
Academic Advising Center
Nominated by: Jayne Kribbs Drake

In the 1996-97 academic year, the College of Arts and Sciences at Temple University wrote a statement into its Strategic Plan setting us on a course that would forever change the way we think about and deliver advising services. It called for the creation of a faculty committee to "identify problems and weaknesses in academic advising and recommend solutions to them." More recently, a decision was made to split the College of Arts and Sciences into the Colleges of Liberal Arts and Science and Technology. With that split came deep, painful cuts in personnel in the Advising Center in order to staff a new center in Science and Technology and a new Division of University Studies. Instead of lamenting our fate and allowing a deteriorating morale to defeat us, we saw an opportunity to rethink and reshape the total package of advising services for the new College of Liberal Arts. Nothing was sacred. We looked at everything from the processes and procedures in the Advising Center and the level of faculty involvement in advising to changing people's perceptions of our work and, indeed, changing the actual location of the Advising Center. The faculty advising committee, workgroups, a research assistant, the College's secretarial staff, and students were all enlisted to help. It is a dynamic, evolving process that has resulted in both an extraordinary Comprehensive Plan for Advising and a leaner, more efficient Advising Center, complete with a new student database and website. The work accomplished in only a short time by a such diverse yet like-minded group of people is a striking acknowledgement of the adage "In many, one." 


California State University, Chico
Advising: A Collaborative Endeavor
Nominated by: G. Robert Standing

Any successful academic advising program requires strong, visible, viable and flexible interrlationships between the myriad of programs services and individuals engaged in the advising endeavor. No one 'owns' advising at the university. There are those who have been given or assumed specific responsibilities for significant aspects of the advising program. Yet without constant efforts to work cooperatively and in coordination with other offices and programs; and share as much as possible a common vision; programs can quickly begin to work at cross-purposes. Resources are used inefficiently. Students in the long-run may suffer. 

The need to provide a seamless advising experience for students has resulted in numerous collaborative efforts between the Aedvising and Orientation Office and other units and programs of the University. One quickly discovers that as a process advising includes parents, pre-admissions counseling and information, planning assistance from transfer institutions, articulation, registration, new student orientation, career planning, procedures and policies, academic departments and colleges, faculty, department secretaries, catalog and other university publications, special populations, and numerous student services. The Advising and Orientation Office directly administers relatively few specific components of this extensive process. 

It is our premise that to the extent that campuses are successful in their collaborative efforts, students are better served, the quality of their educational experience is enhanced, and retention and graduation rates are high. 


Syracuse University
All-University Program to Strengthen Academic Advising
Nominated by: Rosanna Grassi and David Potter

Over the past three years Syracuse University has committed itself to an all-University initiative to improve academic advising. Beginning with a mandate, commitment, and leadership at the highest level, the program has received the active support and involvement from deans, chairs, faculty and staff from throughout the institution's twelve undergraduate schools and colleges, as well as the institution's Graduate School, the Division of Continuing Education, and the All University Honors Program. Specific accomplishments to date include: the development of the Syracuse University Statement on Academic Advising: an annual "Celebrating Academic Opportunities Information Fair;" an all-University Resource Manual for Academic Advising, improved advisor training programs, including the new video Toward Improving Academic Advising; clarification and strengthening of policies and procedures used to recognize and reward academic advising, including the tenure and promotion process; better techniques for evaluating individual advisors and advising systems; several major initiatives to build a comprehensive computer advising information system; the introduction of Mid-Semester Progress Reports; and linking a new series of Freshman Forums and seminars with academic advising assignments. Positive change as a result of these and other initiatives is evidenced by data from various campus student surveys, external consultant reports, and increased retention. Strengthening academic advising is central to Syracuse University's goal of becoming the nation's leading "student-centered research university." 




Home About NACADA Events Programs Resources Services Become a Member

NACADA Executive Office
Kansas State University
2323 Anderson Ave, Suite 225
Manhattan, KS  66502-2912
Phone: (785) 532-5717   Fax: (785) 532-7732
e-mail: nacada@ksu.edu

©1990-2008 National Academic Advising Association
All rights reserved

Notice of Nondiscrimination
Website Copyright
Disclaimer